Long Term Resident of Australia Avoids Minister’s Cancellation of Visa On Character Grounds
Under the Migration Amendment (Character and General Visa Cancellation) Act 2014, the Minister for the Department of Immigration and Border Protection now has a mandatory duty to cancel the visa of a person who fails to satisfy the “character test” by reason of having a substantial criminal record (defined to mean, among other things, having been sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 12 months or more). This amendment came into force on 11 December 2014 and is now codified at section 501(3A) of the Migration Act.
Procedurally, decisions made by a delegate of the Minister to cancel a visa on character grounds can be challenged by means of an appeal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. However, even if a visa holder is successful in the AAT, the Minister retains power (under section 501A of the Act) to personally substitute his or her own decision for a decision of the AAT and to direct once again that the visa be cancelled. The prerequisites for the exercise of this power are that the Minister must have afforded “natural justice” to the visa holder and must be satisfied both that the visa holder does not pass the “character test” and that it is “in the national interest” of Australia that the visa be cancelled.
The Minister’s powers to substitute a different decision from the one made by the AAT were recently tested in a case that was brought before the Federal Court of Australia, Jione v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) FCA 144 (3 March 2015). The full text of the decision can be found at the following link:
...