System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Recent blog posts

Posted by on in General

At present occupations, the State and Territory Governments can approve for the SC 491/190 are strictly limited.

It would appear that the government will be focusing on critical sectors which are:

  • people providing critical or specialist medical services, including air ambulance, medical evacuations and delivering critical medical supplies
  • people with critical skills required to maintain the supply of essential goods and services (such as in medical technology, critical infrastructure, telecommunications, engineering and mining, supply chain logistics, agricultural technology, food production, and the maritime industry)
  • people delivering services in sectors critical to Australia’s economic recovery (such as financial technology, large scale manufacturing, film and television production, and emerging technology), where no Australian worker is available

The Government of South Australia has been advised of a limited number of interim allocation places for the State’s General Skilled and Business Migration Program for 2020/21, which will be prioritised to support South Australia’s economic and public health recovery.

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 3108 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
0

Posted by on in General
FAK19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1124
Federal Court of Australia
Charlesworth J
Migration law - Minister's delegate cancelled applicant's visa ('cancellation decision') under s501(3A) of the Act (Migration Act) - other delegate refused to revoke cancellation decision - Tribunal upheld delegate's decision - applicant sought review - whether Tribunal should have understood that applicant was asserting that, if cancellation decision not revoked, applicant 'must be returned his home country' in circumstances giving rise to breach of 'non-refoulement obligations' - whether Tribunal erroneously treated non-refoulment obligations as 'synonymous' with fulfillment by applicant of 'criterion for a protection visa' - whether failure by Tribunal genuinely to consider 'and intellectually engage with' reason submitted by applicant for cancellation decision's revocation - whether error material - held: jurisdictional error established - application allowed.
FAK19
DUR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCA 1155
Federal Court of Australia
Burley J
Migration law - Minister's delegate refused to grant applicant a Safe Haven Enterprise visa - Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed delegate's decision - appellant appealed - whether failure by Authority to consider 'police and CID extortion claims' and if so whether failure was material - Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184 - held: failure to consider police and CID extortion claims established - jurisdictional error - appeal allowed.
DUR16
ANL17 v Minister for Immigration & Anor (No.2) [2020] FCCA 2166
Federal Circuit Court of Australia
Judge Manousaridis
Migration law - Minister's delegate refused to grant applicant a Safe Haven Enterprise visa - Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed delegate's decision - applicant sought remedies under s476 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - Court found applicant did not make out two grounds of appeal - Court found two appeal grounds 'reasonably arguable' - Court granted applicant leave to amend application to include a further ground - Court ordered that Minister and applicant 'file and serve written submissions' concerning merits of amended application and costs - consideration of submissions - “new information” - s473DD(a) (Migration Act) - whether erroneous consideration of whether 'exceptional circumstances' existed to justify mew information's consideration - whether failure to consider whether new information, if known to delegate, could have affected claims' consideration - whether error of the kind which White J found Authority had made in BVZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 958 - held: Authority made error of kind in BVZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 958 - relief granted.
ANL17

Source: https://benchmarkinc.com.au/web/

Last modified on
Hits: 2503 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
0

Posted by on in General

Turkish Consul-General Sarik Ariyak, aged 50, and his bodyguard, Engin Sever,aged 28, were shot outside a residence on Portland Street, Dover Heights, about 9.45am on Wednesday 17 December 1980.Mr Ariyak and Mr Sever were leaving the residence in separate vehicles, when they were approached by two unknown men, who fired multiple shots at close range before fleeing the area on a motorcycle.

Mr Ariyak died at the scene, and Mr Sever died a short time later at St Vincent’s Hospital.

Despite extensive investigations by police at the time and over the years, no one has ever been charged.

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 822 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
0

Posted by on in General

South Australian Immigration has relesed the following update:

The Government of South Australia has been advised of a limited number of interim allocation places for the State’s General Skilled and Business Migration Program for 2020/21, which will be prioritised to support South Australia’s economic and public health recovery.

The full nomination allocations for 2020/21 will be determined later in the year as part of the 2020/21 Budget process.

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 1419 1 Comment
Rate this blog entry:
0

Posted by on in General

This decision concerns whether an individual that entered Australia as a working holiday maker was a resident of Australia for tax purposes and whether that individual was required to pay tax at the minimum 15 per cent tax rate applying to working holiday maker income or at the rates that otherwise apply more generally to Australian residents (which incorporate the tax-free threshold).

‘This decision upholds the ATO’s current view meaning that employer obligations have not changed, and employers should continue to apply the appropriate tax tables when determining the amount to withhold for working holiday makers,’ Deputy Commissioner Jeremy Geale said.

The parties have until 3 September 2020 to seek special leave to appeal the Full Federal Court’s decision to the High Court.

Source: Addy-v-Commissioner.pdf

Last modified on
Hits: 1387 2 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
0
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio