System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Posted by on in General
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1518
  • 0 Comments

Protection Visas – What is the threshold for “significant harm”?

A case involving subclass 866 visa applicant saw the AAT affirmed the decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection refusing to grant the applicant a protection visa. In this instance, the Tribunal was not satisfied that, on return to Ethiopia, there was a real chance the applicant would face serious harm or a real risk she would face significant harm.

What harm was claimed?

The applicant claimed to fear harm based on her gender, ethnicity, imputed political opinions and former occupation as a journalist, amongst other things.

While the Tribunal accepted there was evidence of gender-based violence against women in Ethiopia, it was not satisfied that if forced to return, the applicant would be placed into a situation where she would face a real chance of serious harm or a real risk of significant harm on that basis.

The Tribunal relied on the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey, provided by the applicant, which showed women who had never been married experience a substantially lower incidence of violence than married women. The Tribunal found the category ‘never married’ best fitted the applicant as she had not been exposed to the actions of a partner in the context of living in Ethiopia under its jurisdiction and culture, and would not be in a relationship in the foreseeable future, because her current partner was in Australia.

While the Tribunal acknowledged inter-ethnic violence had occurred in the past, current country information showed fundamental changes had happened in the political system in Ethiopia over the last two years. Consequently, the Tribunal found the applicant’s Oromo ethnicity and perceived association with the political organisation, the Oromo Liberation Front, would not put her at a real chance of facing serious harm or a real risk of significant harm in the foreseeable future.

The applicant’s verbal evidence that her work as a journalist would lead to her being imprisoned, was given little weight as international sources, including a recent Reporters Without Borders article and Human Rights Watch report, were found to be more credible. The country information in these sources, with respect to journalists, was that for the first time in more than 15 years, none were being held in prison in connection with their work. Consequently, the Tribunal found that she did not meet either criterion with respect to this claim.

As per the policy, in order to satisfy the criteria for 866 visa, there must be significant and a real risk of serious harm including

  • Threat to their life (such as the death penalty) or liberty
  • Significant physical harassment and/or ill treatment (torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment)
  • Significant economic hardship that threatens the person’s ability to survive
  • Denial of access to basic services that threatens the person’s ability to survive
  • Denial of their ability to earn a livelihood of any kind, that threatens their survival
  • It is not reasonable for the applicant to modify their behaviour
  • There are no effective protection measures in the applicant’s home country
  • It is not possible for the applicant to relocate to a different part of their country where they will not face real risk of significant harm

Full case can be found here:

https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/AATA/2020/1544.html?context=1;query=1619347;mask_path=

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
1

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Friday, 29 March 2024
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio

Immigration blog

Bizcover Banner
Migration Amendment (Removal and Other Measures) Bill 2024
The Migration Amendment (Removal and Other Measure...
Continue Reading...
Migration (Class of Persons for Nil VAC-LIN 24/008) Specification 2024
The Migration (Class of Persons for Nil VAC—LIN 24...
Continue Reading...
Pacific Engagement (Subclass 192) visa ballot
Introducing the Pacific Engagement Visa Initiative...
Continue Reading...