Australian Immigration Daily News

Unverified news:

Yet to be confirmed.

Please could agents verify this news which has come to Migration Alliance via telephone today from a reliable source?

The AAT Bulletin has been released today and makes excellent reading:

AAT-Bulletin-14-October-2019.pdf

Below is Migration Newsletter 747 which makes excellent reading.

Migration_Newsletter_747.pdf

Members of the police’s Women and Children Protection Center – Visayas Field Unit (WCPC-VFU) and local police units carried out a series of entrapment and rescue operations in the province of Biliran on October 9 and 10.

The five suspects – aged 22, 23, 26, 28, and 30 – were arrested at several different locations. In total, the five victims rescued ranged in age from 14 to 17 years old.

In addition to the five rescued victims, in total four other children were removed as “at-risk” for assessment to determine if they, too, were victimized.  They include a 10-month-old, an 11-month-old, and two 2-year-olds.

I am not going to give up the fight to have unregistered immigration practitioners removed from lodging Australian visa applications for and on behalf of unwitting clients.  The fresh new Form 956 goes part of the way there on this journey, but we need to keep moving forward.

Unregistered migration practitioners who engage in the lodgement of Australian visa applications on behalf of vulnerable persons are exploitative, predatory and unethical.  They do not have a demonstrated level of sound knowledge.  If they were registered, the level of incompetency shown in their work would likely result in a decision by the Office of the MARA to cancel their registration, and the removal of their right to practise.

Sometimes unregistered practitioners commit offences under a number of different laws over an extended period.  Use the examples of Abel Kalpinand Prasad, or Eddy Kang.  These two individuals were operating onshore, on our own Australian soil.  Look how hard it has been for the authorities to bring them to justice.  If only they had been banned from lodging visa applications in the first place.  If only the system prevented their access.