System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Recent blog posts

Posted by on in General

The new charges are as follows:

  • Standard Competency Demonstration Report: $874.50 (AUD)
  • Australian Engineering Qualification Assessment: $291.50 (AUD)
  • Washington/Sydney/Dublin Accord Qualification Assessment: $470.80 (AUD)

Other administrative fees:

  • Informal Review: $313.50 (AUD)
  • Formal Appeal: $594.00 (AUD)
  • Standard Administration Fee: $121.00 (AUD)
  • Fast Track Fee: $335.50 (AUD)

Source: https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/For-Migrants/Migration-Skills-Assessment/Migration-Fees

Last modified on
Hits: 6034 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
0

Posted by on in General

The process of sponsoring an employee on a TSS (482) visa should be viewed beyond transactional aspect of obtaining a TSS visa.  As an approved business sponsor, there are a number of Sponsorship Obligations which the sponsoring entity must meet as part of holding their sponsorship status.  In broad terms, the following Sponsorship Obligations apply to all standard and accredited business sponsors:

Notify the Department of Home Affairs when the following occurs:

  • the visa holder’s employment ends or is expected to end
  • there are changes to the work duties carried out by the sponsored visa holder
  • the sponsor pays or has paid the return travel costs of a sponsored visa holder or any of their family members in accordance with the obligation to pay return travel costs
  • the sponsor becomes insolvent within the meaning of subsections 5 (2) and (3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 and section 95A of the Corporations Act 2001
  • the business ceases to exist as a legal entity

These are just some of the examples of sponsorship obligations.  The remainder of which can be found on Home Affairs website: https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/visas/employing-and-sponsoring-someone/existing-sponsors/standard-business-accredited-obligations

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 2869 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
4

Posted by on in General

To manage the Australian border, the Department implements Australia’s universal visa system, under which all non-citizens require a valid visa to come to Australia. The Department also confers citizenship on eligible applicants. There are broadly two types of visas:

  • higher volume, generally simpler, temporary entry visa products
  • lower volume, longer-term migration visas requiring more complex assessment.

Business visitor visas allow for travel to Australia for short term tourism or business visits.

The principles governing the entry of visitors are that visitors to Australia must: 

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 1572 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
1

Posted by on in General
Narayan v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 143
Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Flick, Bromwich & Burley JJ
Migration - appellant's visa cancelled under s501(3A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (Migration Act) - appellant sought that visa's cancellation be revoked under s501CA(4) Migration Act - Assistant Minster refused to revoke cancellation - primary judge dismissed judicial review application - whether to permit appellant to rely on ground of review not raised in Court below - whether error in primary judge's decision - held: appeal dismissed.
Narayan
BTN16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1354
Federal Court of Australia
Moshinsky J
Migration - first respondent's delegate refused to grant appellant a protection visa - Refugee Review Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision - primary judge dismissed application for judicial review - whether primary judge erred in dealing with 'section 438 certificate' issue - whether Tribunal was 'acted in a manifestly unreasonable way' - held: appeal dismissed.
BTN16
EMX17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1337
Federal Court of Australia
Jackson J
Migration - first respondent's delegate refused to grant appellant a safe haven enterprise visa - Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed delegate's decision - Federal Circuit Court dismissed judicial review application - appellant appealed - whether erroneous failure to apply 'real chance' test - speculation - s5J Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - held: appeal dismissed.
EMX17
AVC15 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1356
Federal Court of Australia
Katzmann J
Migration - applicant unsuccessfully sought protection visa from Minister - applicant's 'merits review' application in Administrative Appeals Tribunal did not succeed - primary judge dismissed application for judicial review - applicant sought extension of time to appeal - r1.39 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) - s37M Federal Court of Australia Act 1977 (Cth) - Seiler v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs [1994] FCA 878 - held: extension of time refused.
AVC15
CHJK v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1330
Federal Court of Australia
Flick J
Migration - applicant's protection visa 'mandatorily cancelled' under s501(3A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ('cancellation decision') - Minister's delegate declined to revoke cancellation decision - Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision - applicant sought review - whether 'failure to consider or to properly consider' - Direction No. 79 - whether failure to take International Treaties Obligations Assessment into account - held: Tribunal's decision set aside - matter remitted.
CHJK

Source:  Benchmark Inc

Last modified on
Hits: 2236 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
2

Posted by on in General

Many agents are still trying to complete all their annual 10 CPD points via distance learning (private study) then submitting their re-registration application to the Office of the MARA.

The Office of the MARA are asking RMAs who have done this to go back and do 5 extra CPD from Category A activities.  The law changed on 1 January 2018 and transitional exemptions no longer exist.

Distance Learning (Private Study) is a Category B activity and RMAs must only do a maximum of 5 Category B Activities per registration year towards their 10 points for re-registration. 

At least 5 CPD activities should be from Category A every registration year. Examples of Category A activities would be webinar workshops and face-to-face workshops.   

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 2606 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
4
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio