Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au
Employers who wish to nominate a foreign employee for ENS Subclass 186 visa (permanent residence) will be required to evidence that there is a genuine need for an employee to occupy certain position on a permanent and ongoing basis.
This criterion is applicable to Temporary Residence Transition Stream as well as Direct Entry Stream respectively. The appears to be a level of misunderstanding regarding this requirement, particularly, that such evidence needs to come in a form of Labour Market Testing (similar to the process of sponsoring a TSS employee). The purpose of this article is to clarify this requirement and provide suggestions in terms of evidence could be provided by an employer for the Department to consider.
Temporary Residence Transition Stream (TRTS):
Looking at the Policy extract for TRTS, paragraph 5.19(5)(k) requires the nominator to have a genuine need to employ the person to work in the position under their direct control.
Since implementation of the TSS visa, there is no longer an assumption, or “automatic right” to a pathway to permanent residence, there is a specified genuine need for the nominee to remain employed in the nominated position.
When assessing ‘genuine need’, Home Affairs will take into account the following:
Note – This is not the same as having to provide evidence of Labour Market Testing for TSS visa.
What evidence will the Department consider?
The application form itself will provide answers to a number of questions associated with the position. For example, length of employment, business structure, industry sector and number of foreign employees employed by the business.
Financial annual report should provide case officers with insight relating to any increased activity within the business. A small business may consider including evidence of any future expansion (for example, new contracts and projects won). The Department will also consider whether refusal of the nomination is likely to impact the business in adversely.
Direct Entry applications (DE):
Threshold for Direct Entry applications is somewhat higher given that an employee (in the eyes of the Department) is largely considered to be untested in the Australian Labour Market by the Department. Specific Direct Entry Requirements are outlined below:
Scenario 1 - perform activities to lead or assist with the diversification
An example would be where a business that is currently involved in running a restaurant nominates the position of business development manager on the premise that they wish to start up or purchase a number of restaurants.
In this instance, a case officer would need to be satisfied that the business has the intention and the financial capacity to support such business expansion, taking into account any evidence provided, including:
It is strongly advised that Genuine Need for DE applications are supported by submission on behalf of the employer to ensure that all supporting documentation is considered appropriately by the case officer.
Scenario 2 - work within the diversified (new) environment
An example would be a business that is currently involved in running fitness centre and decide to nominate a Chiropractor on the basis that they intend to diversify their business operations.
Decision-makers would need to be satisfied that the business has the capacity and intention to diversify their business activity, taking into account any evidence provided, including:
Information that may be considered adverse information should also be addressed in order to ensure that full context of the situation is adequately presented.
Any of the following actions by the nominating employer regarding other employees, including Australian workers, in the nominated occupation or similar occupations may be indicative of the nominated position not being genuinely needed:
Each case will be different, and it is important to ensure that the nature of the business, details pertaining the position are sufficiently presented to Home Affairs, particularly in relation to Direct Entry applications. Other factors including size of the business, whether the business has previously nominated an employee for permanent residence under ENS will also be considered by the Department.
Legal Training Australia will be running several Category A workshops in May/June/July. The purpose of the workshops is to provide Registered Migration Agents up to date practical tips associated with TSS/ENS nominations. The workshops are beneficial for migration agents of all levels and can be booked online using the following link:
https://legaltrainingaustralia.com/webinar-cpd/
It's not confusion around the legislative criteria, it is best practice - Evidence of LMT is in the best interests of your client and their matter. Indeed, if more 'agents' considered how LMT can assist their clients - rather than hinder them, case officers would not struggle so much to make decisions. Frankly, if a business is not advertising for a worker and they claim they need a worker... Well...
I guess some people understand the letter of the Law, not the spirit of the Law..... or the purpose of...
It's a sad day.