Login / Join
Australian Immigration Daily News
Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au
- Font size: Larger Smaller
- Hits: 7251
- 3 Comments
Out of time at the AAT? Out of luck? Not necessarily...
In a Migration Law Updates email yesterday titled " Good news: AAT reopens "late" application" by Sergio Stagliorio, Sergio (aka the writer) writes about Mark Northam and himself recently summarising the Federal Court (Full Court) decision in DFQ17 where it was held that a "late" Tribunal application was actually NOT late.
To be clear about this, and to give credit where credit is due, Michael Arch, member of the Migration Alliance committee first wrote a full and concise summary about this topic on 29 April 2019 in his article titled "Important Case about Late Filings in the AAT. Salvation may be at Hand".
As a general rule Migration Alliance will release the news first, and unlike some other migration news updates, all news on Migration Alliance is FREE.
Christopher Levingston says:
"These developments with respect to the AAT will have strategic implications for your clients who appear to be out of time, and this may well represent a lifeline to RMAs who find themselves out of time and want to remedy the situation for their clients".
If you need any help in formulating a position or need assistance with this then please email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. where the advice will be FREE.
Comments
-
Wednesday, 19 June 2019Yes totally agree. Michael Arch's articles are excellent: intelligent, practical and written with a mature style.
-
Wednesday, 19 June 2019
Agreed. Copy and pasting catchwords and statements from websites is hardly news, but none of the references above are engaged in that. Adding analysis and perspective is what makes the difference between news and more valuable content. In fact, that's what we as RMAs do anyway - we take publicly available info (legislation, etc), add our experience and analysis, and charge people for that information - our clients. Anybody can report a court case, but only a good writer can explain how that court case can be immediately beneficial to our clients - that sort of research/perspective/analysis is certainly worth paying for in my view.
Immigration blog
About time someone said that paying for 'news' which is already available on government websites is not something we want to do.