Jeff Harvie (MARN 0959797) runs Down Under Visa in Manila, Philippines. They do nothing but partner visas and tourist visas for Australian Filipino couples, and have got very good at it over the years.

Jeff wife Mila is Filipina, and they went through the migration process themselves many years ago. Down Under Visa is run as a family business, with Jeff’s son Jeremy as their office manager too. They have lived and worked full time in Manila for the last 5 years, which means they are always there to tend to the needs of the local applicants in the emotion-charged world of partner visas. This is a vocation for them, and they really care about the well-being and final outcome for their many clients.

Despite having a team of 7, every visa application is personally supervised by Jeff. No fly-in, fly-out RMA service here. No local staff making decisions or giving advice. And support is given online through a personal client portal providing support 24/7, backed up by fast email support, so no one is ever too far from their office. Their website is full of video and written testimonials from happy clients which back all of this up.

The following information has been received from the DIBP:

Dear agent

Further to the email you received on 3 July 2015, the following new instruments: IMMI 15/108, Migration Regulations 1994 - Specification of Occupations, a Person or Body, a Country or Countries 2015, and IMMI 15/109, Migration Regulations 1994 - Specification of Class of Persons 2015 have been issued and are in effect as of 1 July 2015.

A new legislative instrument has been rushed through to correct an omission in the Consolidated Skills Occupation list specified by the legislative instrument IMMI15/092.

In the original instrument, the occupation 241213: Primary School Teacher was inadvertently left out.

The department of immigration issued a new legislative instrument (IMMI 15/108) yesterday and backdated it to 1 July 2015 putting Primary School Teachers back on the CSOL. In an email alert the DIBP confirmed that IMMI 15/108 has the effect of Primary School Teacher (ANZSCO 241213) being an eligible occupation for nomination for the following visa programmes from 1 July 2015:

• Skilled Nominated visa (Subclass 190)
• Direct entry stream of Employer Nomination Scheme (Subclass 186)
• Temporary Work (Skilled) visa (Subclass 457)
• Training and Research Visa (Subclass 402)

A further instrument was also issued to correct an error in the instrument IMMI 15/083. The new instrument IMMI 15/109 has the effect of eligible Special Category visa (Subclass 444) and New Zealand Family Relationship (Temporary) visa (Subclass 461) holders being exempt from meeting the skill requirement for the Direct Entry stream of the Employer Nomination Scheme (Subclass 186 visa).

IMMI 15/109 also has the effect of Child Care Group Leader (Aus) (Skill level 2) (ANZSCO 421111) being an eligible occupation for nomination under the Direct Entry stream of the Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme (Subclass 187 visa) from 1 July 2015.

Young Australians seem to have lost their love affair with technology with the number of graduates with ICT qualifications steadily falling since early 2000s, says a new report by the Australian Computer Society and Deloitte Access Economics. Should the trend continue, the next six years could see a record demand for overseas ICT workers given the steady growth of the technology sector and business demand for ICT workers.

Australia’s ICT industry employs around 600,000 workers. Interestingly enough, one of the biggest employers of ICT workers in Australia is the department of immigration (DIBP) with an estimated 1,600 ICT employees. However, the report notes even the DIBP finds it difficult to get the ICT staff it needs stating, ‘there are still a number of gaps in relation to the technical skills required within the organisation’.

With the government absorbing large numbers of ICT workers and the Silicon Valley companies drawing the best local graduates, private enterprise have been left to rely on ICT workers from overseas to fill the gap for over a decade now.

The ACS has noted that Australia is just not creating enough graduates to meet business demand, and it’s becoming a massive problem forcing companies to turn to overseas skilled workers to meet business needs. There could well be an acute shortage of workers in the next few years.

The reports states that consultations with the business community suggest that there are shortages in skills such as programming and coding, computer science theory and computational thinking with businesses relying on overseas workers for key technical capabilities such as software development and programming.

The report notes that Visa grants for temporary skilled migration of ICT workers have historically accounted for around 10–15% of total 457 visa grants. In the 2013–14 financial year, almost 12,000 ICT workers were granted 457 visas, representing 12% of total visas granted. This year it is expected to increase with the occupational ceilings raised for several ICT related occupations.

It will be well-known to RMAs that a person who fails to lodge an application for a new substantive visa with the Department before an existing visa has expired may encounter major difficulties in obtaining the new visa. 

These difficulties may be posed by the need to comply with the criteria of Schedule 3 of the Migration Regulations.  For example, Clause 3004 of Schedule 3 provides that if the applicant has ceased to hold a substantive visa (or criminal justice visa) at any time after 1 September 1994, the applicant must satisfy the Department , among other things, that she or he does not currently hold a substantive visa due to factors beyond her/his control; that there are compelling reasons for the grant of the new visa; and that the applicant has “complied substantially” with the conditions that applied to the last substantive visa that was held.

A decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia has clarified the meaning of clause 3004, and has explained the nature and extent of the “compliance” with the conditions of a person’s last substantive visa that must be achieved in order to satisfy clause 3004. This decision was made in the case of Montero v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, (2014) FCAFC 170 (12 December 2014).