Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au
Welcome to the Victorian Government's Agent Alert for migration agents and representatives.
In this edition:
Changes to the Victorian State Nomination Occupation list
...'Payment for visas' conduct is not currently unlawful. However a key recommendation of the independent review into the subclass 457 program recommended that legislation is introduced to strengthen the integrity of the program by allowing action to be taken where 'payment for visas' conduct has occurred.
In his second reading speech, Mr Dutton noted that 'payment for visas' conduct may occur through an employer offering to sponsor a visa applicant in return for a payment or benefit. It may occur before the applicant applies for a visa or during the visa holder's stay in Australia. Evidence obtained through monitoring sponsors indicates that the sponsor and applicant are complicit in the majority of 'payment for visas' activity. Employers may also exploit an employee by requiring payment in return for an ongoing sponsorship.
The bill will amend the act to make it a criminal offence for a sponsor or other third party to ask for or receive a benefit in relation to a sponsorship related event. The offence will be punishable by a maximum of two years imprisonment or a fine of up to 360 penalty units, which currently equates to $64,800 for an individual person or five times higher—$324,000—for a body corporate.
The bill introduces civil penalties applicable to a sponsor, visa applicant or any other third party who asks for or receives, or provides or offers a benefit in relation to a sponsorship related event. The maximum pecuniary penalty is 240 penalty units, which currently equates to $43,200 for an individual person or five times higher—$216,000—for a body corporate.
...If you were to kill your wife of 30 years by repeatedly hitting her in the head with a hammer while she slept next to your 8 year old child, and the child woke up during the attack and witnessed some of the fatal blows, what chance do you think you would have of getting the Full Court to reverse a decision by the Minister to cancel your visa?
Well, if you would rate the prospects of a person who has been convicted of such a heinous crime as being “negligible”, “non-existent”, “microscopic”, “below the size of a subatomic particle” or, as Australian lawyers love to say “doomed to failure” – you’d be right!!
Such was the result in the case of Roesner v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) FCAFC 132 (15 September 2015). Yes, in this case the Full Court dismissed a challenge to the Minister’s cancellation of his visa on character grounds. This despite the fact that the visa holder had lived in Australia for over 40 years at the time of the offence, and notwithstanding his pleas that he wished to grow old with his children by staying in Australia” (at the time that his visa was cancelled, in August 2014, the visa holder would have been about 73 years old).
...Partnering with Migration Alliance, our national SIV road show continues with Brisbane on Wednesday 7th October. The event will showcase NAB’s integrated banking and investment solutions to meet the needs of your Significant Investor Visa clients.
Speakers include Greg McKean from QLD Trade and Investment, NAB’s SIV Concierge team of migrant banking and wealth professionals, and a local venture capital manager.
You will also meet investment specialists from NAB Asset Management and JB Were who make up NAB’s SIV Complying portfolio blends covering Australian small companies, corporate fixed interest and property securities.
...