 
					
				
				
				Do you think that Public Interest Criterion 4020 should impose “strict” or “absolute” liability on a visa applicant?
Should PIC 4020 be applied as grounds for the refusal of an application when an applicant plays no role at all in the creation of a “bogus document”, and that document is in fact created and sent to the Department with the malign purpose of sabotaging or destroying the visa application?
Is it enough that an applicant gives documents to an “intermediary” to send to the Department, and that intermediary then creates the bogus document?
...