System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Recent blog posts

Posted by on in General

The Commonwealth Ombudsman (the Ombudsman) is required by the Migration Act 1958  to assess the appropriateness of the immigration detention arrangements for each person detained for two years or more. The Ombudsman's assessment is provided to the Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs, along with a de-identified version, which the Minister must table in Parliament.

Recent report published by the ombudsman covers ten case studies of migrants held in detention centre.  A summary of the report is detailed in this article.

The report covers ten cases as mentioned, a particular case covers a 35-year-old man who has been in detention for 2,547 days (almost seven years).  This is now the 6th time this case has come up before a review. The Department’s report advised that Mr X had no outstanding matters before the Department, tribunals or the courts and has been on an involuntary removal pathway since May 2015. The Ombudsman’s previous assessment recommended that this case be referred to the Minister for consideration under s 195A for the grant of a bridging visa, given the protracted nature of the man’s removal from Australia and the adverse impact of remaining in detention. On 12 September 2019 the Minister advised in a tabling statement that the Department had recently referred this case for his consideration.  The Ombudsman’s recent recommendation is that this case be expedited. The Ombudsman is concerned that the man is likely to remain in immigration detention for a prolonged period due to the protracted nature of his removal from Australia. This poses a significant risk to his health and welfare.

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 1231 1 Comment
Rate this blog entry:
2

Posted by on in General
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CED16 [2020] HCA 24
High Court of Australia
Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon and Edelman JJ
Migration law - delegate of Minister refused to grant first respondent protection visa - Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed delegate’s decision - Judge Street of Federal Circuit Court of Australia dismissed judicial review application - Derrington J of Federal Court of Australia allowed appeal against Judge Street’s decision - Minister appealed by special leave - appeal concerned meaning of "new information" - first respondent conceded ’Certificate’ could not satisfy condition in s473DE(1)(a)(ii) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (Migration Act) ’as interpreted in’ SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 81 ALJR 1190, Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZLFX [2009] HCA 31, Plaintiff M174/2016 [2018] HCA 16 and SZMTA [2019] HCA 3 - first respondent, however, contended Derrington J correct to find Certificate was "new information" and correct to conclude receipt of that "new information" caused Authority ’to fall into jurisdictional error’ by failure to perform ’procedural obligation’ which s473DB(1)(a) Migration Act imposed - whether Certificate could not satisfy description of "information" - whether Certificate was "document" - whether Certificate contained "information" within reference to "any documents or information" in definition of "new information" in s473DC(1) Migration Act - held: appeal allowed.
Minister
Ali v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 109
Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Collier, Reeves & Derrington JJ
Migration law - Minister cancelled appellant's partner visa on “character” grounds under s501(3A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (cancellation decision) - Assistant Minister was not satisfied of matters in ss501CA(4)(b)(i) & (ii) Migration Act - Assistant Minister refused to revoke cancellation decision - Steward J of Federal Court of Australia dismissed judicial review application - 'international non-refoulment obligations' - “another reason” - whether Assistant Minister erred in not being satisfied of matters in ss501CA(4)(b)(i) & (ii) Migration Act - whether necessary to determine non-refoulment obligations - whether permissible to defer consideration of non-refoulment obligations until 'any subsequent consideration' of protection visa application - “Failure to Consider Ground” - “The Identical Manner of Consideration Ground” - “Absence of Full Consideration Ground” - Hernandez v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 415 held: Assistant Minister's decision did not accord with requirements of s501CA(4) Migration Act - appeal allowed.
Ali
Walker v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 909
Federal Court of Australia
Bromwich J
Migration law - applicant’s temporary visa cancelled under s501(3A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (cancellation decision) - Minister refused to revoke cancellation decision - applicant sought judicial review - applicant challenged basis for Minister’s finding that applicant ’represented an unacceptable risk of harm’ outweighing considerations favouring revocation - use of ’past non-violent conduct and its violent outcome’ to find risk of violent conduct’s repetition - whether Minister’s decision ’legally unreasonable’ - Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18 - held: legal unreasonableness established - judicial review application upheld.
Walker

Source:  Benchmark

Last modified on
Hits: 1204 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
1

Posted by on in General

The General Skilled Migration (GSM) program for the 2019/20 financial year has now closed. 

The State & Territory nomination program will remain temporarily CLOSED until the Commonwealth Government s allocation of state nomination places for 2020-21 takes place. This means that State & Territory governments have no ability to nominate applicants in visa subclass 190 & visa subclass 491. 

The GSM 2020/21 program year is scheduled to re-open from early August however, changes to the composition of the Australian Migration program might be made in October under the new budget. 

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 4921 1 Comment
Rate this blog entry:
2

Posted by on in General

The Victorian Government’s state nomination program will remain temporarily closed while the State await the Commonwealth Government’s allocation of state nomination places for 2020-21.

In the meantime, applicants will not be able to apply for the following state nomination visas:

  • Skilled Work Regional (Provisional) (subclass 491) visa
  • Skilled Nominated (subclass 190) visa
  • Business Innovation stream (subclass 188A) (Provisional) visa
  • Investor stream (subclass 188B) (Provisional) visa
  • Significant Investor stream (subclass 188C) (Provisional) visa
  • Entrepreneur stream (subclass 188E) (Provisional) visa
  • Significant Business History  (subclass 132A) (Permanent) visa
  • Venture Capital Entrepreneur (subclass 132B) (Permanent) visa

Applicants can still lodge their Expression of Interest (EOI) through the Commonwealth’s Department of Home Affairs SkillSelect system.  An EOI will be required before an applicant can apply for a Victorian visa nomination.

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 1839 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
1

Posted by on in General

Immigration South Australia has confirmed today that both Business and Skilled Migration program will remain closed until August 2020.

This means that no applications can be made for the following subclasses:

 

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 1758 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
1
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio