System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Posted by on in General
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 3640
  • 0 Comments

Marking the TOEFL iBT® Test: 6 Ways ETS Makes It Fair

Australian agencies, professional bodies, universities and other organisations rely on TOEFL iBT® scores to give them consistent, objective results about test takers’ English-language abilities. But how do they do that, with test takers from all over the world?

The structure of the test

First, a brief review of the test structure. The TOEFL iBT test has 4 sections—Reading, Listening, Speaking, and Writing. The test is taken on computer at secure test centres, where test takers use headphones for the listening passages and a microphone for the spoken responses.

The Reading and Listening sections are composed of multiple-choice questions that are marked automatically by computer.

The Speaking and Writing sections have open-ended questions (also called “constructed-response” questions, in testing parlance) that require test takers to speak their responses into a microphone and type their essays on the computer.

So how does ETS ensure that marking is fair? Here are 6 ways.

1. Most important, no marking takes place at test centres. All marking is done through a centralised scoring network that implements and ensures consistent scoring standards to help ensure the security and integrity of scores.

2. For the constructed-response questions, ETS uses both human markers and automated marking methods, for a complete and accurate picture of a test taker's ability. Although automated marking models have advantages, human markers are also needed to measure the effectiveness of the language response and the appropriateness of its content.

3. ETS markers must undergo extensive training, pass a certification test, and pass daily calibration tests to ensure they are marking consistently. Markers are continuously monitored for accuracy by ETS scoring leaders and checked each time they score a new test question.

4. ETS uses a highly diverse pool of markers rather than those exclusive to an applicant's country of origin. Markers see and hear worldwide responses.

5. ETS markers score responses anonymously for truly objective scoring.

6. Multiple markers’ judgments contribute to each test taker's Speaking and Writing scores in order to minimize marking bias with 3-6 different markers used for the Speaking items and 4 ratings for the Writing responses.

For more information about TOEFL iBT scores, visit https://www.ets.org/toefl/ibt/scores/

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Saturday, 30 November 2024
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio