System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Posted by on in General
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1041
  • 0 Comments

Federal Court Cases - Migration Law - 29 October 2020

ADL17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 178
Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
White, Bromwich & Burley JJ
Migration law - Minister's delegate refused appellant's application for a Safe Haven Enterprise Visa (subclass 790) (SHEV) - Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed delegate's decision - Judge A Kelly of Federal Circuit Court of Australia dismissed appellant's judicial review application - appellant appealed - 'proper application of' s5J(3)(a) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - whether Immigration Assessment Authority was required, in its consideration of complementary protection claims under s36(2)(aa) Migration Act, to apply principles in Appellant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 71 - grant of special leave by High Court to appeal from DQU16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 518 - claim of well-founded fear of persecution on basis of appellant's membership of 'particular social group' whether Authority made finding for purposes of s5L(c)(ii) Migration and, if so, whether it overlooked finding in considering application of s5J(3) Migration Act - whether Authority made findings concerning 'particular social group to which the appellant could belong' - whether Authority failed to make assessment as required by s5J(3) Migration Act concerning whether appellant could take steps to 'modify his behaviour' such that 'real chance of persecution' could be avoided - held: Authority's finding concerning ability of appellant to 'avoid a real chance of persecution' was not open - inappropriate and unnecessary to consider whether Authority required to apply principles in to apply principles in Appellant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 71 - appeal allowed.
ADL17
NWWJ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 176
Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Perram, Derrington & Stewart JJ
Migration law - self-represented applicant - Minister's delegate declined to revoke cancellation of applicant's Partner (Residence) (Class BS) visa - Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision - applicant sought judicial review - applicant sought to quash Tribunal's decision - applicant also sought that delegate's decision to cancel visa 'be reviewed and revoked' - applicant also sought review of refusal to grant 'bridging visa application' - failure of applicant to join Tribunal resulting in lack of jurisdiction - 'unparticularised assertion of error' by Tribunal - whether Tribunal relied on 'fraudulent or false' documents - whether applicant denied procedural fairness due to being self-represented and 'being in immigration detention' during hearing - Tribunal's inability to go behind and question conviction when exercising power - HZCP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 202 - held: no error in decision of Tribunal - application dismissed.
NWWJ

Minister for Home Affairs v Waraich [2020] FCA 1513
Federal Court of Australia
Anastassiou J
Migration law - applicant revoked citizenship of first respondent - Administrative Appeal Tribunal set applicant's decision aside - applicant sought judicial review - applicant contended failure by Tribunal to consider 'oral evidence' of first respondent - applicant also contended Tribunal had 'misunderstood and misapplied' s34(2)(c) Citizenship Act 2007 ( Cth) in manner 'material to its decision' - “seriously advanced" - “worthy of serious consideration” - whether Tribunal overlooked 'substantial arguments' in particular the argument that that applicant's 'admitted dishonesty' 'over and above' first respondent's convictions favoured affirmation of 'decision under review' - Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v DRP17 [2018] FCAFC 198 - “contrary to the public interest” - “in the public interest" - held: grounds of review established - application granted.
Minister for Home Affairs

Source: https://benchmarkinc.com.au/web/

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Monday, 25 November 2024
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio