System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Posted by on in General
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1764
  • 0 Comments

Federal Court Summaries 27 June 2019: Migration Law

Minister for Home Affairs v Ogawa [2019] FCAFC 98
Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Collier, Reeves, Davies, Rangiah & Steward JJ
Migration law - respondent sought Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) Visa - appellant, under s501(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (Migration Act), refused application - single judge of Federal Court of Australia quashed Minister's decision, finding Minister had not complied with obligation contained in ss54(1) & 55(1) Migration Act 'to have regard to two items of information' which respondent provided - primary judge also found Minister's refusal 'to defer his decision', when a decision had not yet been made on respondent's petition for pardon, was 'legally unreasonable' - 'Dr Whittington's letter' (letter) - 'Emotional Intelligence Certificate' - whether breach of natural justice - whether breach of s56(1) Migration Act - held: Minister erroneously failed to have regard to information in letter - appeal dismissed.
Minister for Home Affairs
Song v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 970
Federal Court of Australia
Perram J
Migration - two appeals - applicant sought Temporary Business Entry (Class UC) (Subclass 457) visa - applicant nominated company as sponsor - company sought approval to nominate applicant as 'web administrator' - delegate refused company's application because delegate not satisfied web administrator position genuine - delegate refused applicant's visa application on basis applicant not sponsored by 'approved sponsor' - Tribunal dismissed applications for judicial review - appeals from decisions of Federal Circuit Court - whether erroneous failure to find error by Tribunal - held: company's appeal dismissed - applicant's appeal dismissed 'as a matter of logic'.
Song
DZF17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 979
Federal Court of Australia
Thawley J
Migration - first respondent's delegate refused to grant appellant a protection visa - Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed delegate's decision - Federal Circuit Court of Australia dismissed application for judicial review - whether to grant leave to raise new appeal grounds - whether failure to consider 'important and centrally relevant evidence' - whether 'legal unreasonableness' - s473DC(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - held: Authority did not properly consider "review material" - appeal allowed.
DZF17
Gohil v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 977
Federal Court of Australia
Perram J
Migration - Minister's delegate refused to grant appellant a Temporary Work (Skilled) (subclass 457) visa - Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) found it lacked jurisdiction to review decision - Federal Circuit Court dismissed application to quash Tribunal's decision - whether erroneous finding of lack of jurisdiction - s348(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - absence of 'approved nomination' - held: appeal dismissed.
Gohil
DGS17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 962
Federal Court of Australia
Farrell J
Migration - first respondent's delegate refused to grant appellant a Safe Haven Enterprise visa (SHEV) - Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed delegate's decision - Federal Circuit Court of Australia dismissed judicial review application - requirement of 'identification of error' - FLW17 v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2019] FCA 352 - whether Authority failed 'to consider all relevant circumstances' in assessing whether there were 'exceptional circumstances' justifying consideration of 'Al Jazeera article' - whether jurisdictional error arising from 'misstatements' - held: appeal dismissed.
DGS17

Source: https://benchmarkinc.com.au/web/

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
2

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Thursday, 28 November 2024
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio