Login / Join
Immigration Daily News Australia, NZ, UK and Canada visa-free ‘migration bloc’ gets strong support
- Font size: Larger Smaller
- Hits: 3746
- 2 Comments
Australia, NZ, UK and Canada visa-free ‘migration bloc’ gets strong support
A survey of almost 4000 people in these four Commonwealth nations, has found that there is massive support for a European Union-style system of free movement between these countries.
Seventy per cent of Australians were in favour of the idea of the ‘migration bloc’ with only one in ten opposed. Support was stronger among Canadians (75 per cent), New Zealanders (82 per cent) and people under the age of 35.
Tim Hewish, author of the report and director of policy and research at the Royal Commonwealth Society, told The Guardian that there was clearly “immense support” from Australians, Canadians and New Zealanders for the freedom to live and work in the UK.
“Collectively we possess a unique bond which needs protecting. We share a language, a legal system, and a Queen.” Tim Hewish, Royal Commonwealth Society.
The policy however was least popular among UK nationals with support at 58 per cent. This is despite the fact that there are more UK nationals in the other three countries than there are the nationals of Australia, New Zealand and Canada, in the UK.
Policies in the UK are currently moving in the opposite direction and aiming to restrict work rights of foreigners. According to a report in The Guardian, from 6 April, all skilled workers from outside the European Union who have been in the UK for less than 10 years will need to earn at least £35,000 a year in order to qualify for a Tier 2 visa and settle there permanently.
Australians and New Zealanders in the UK for six months or more will also be required to pay an annual surcharge of £200 (A$380 and NZ$426) to access some health services.
Comments
-
Wednesday, 16 March 2016The problems in the UK are brought about with the introduction of open door policies by the EU. Generally, the UK population are fed up with being saddled with unacceptable levels of migrants, who come in via Europe, then claim UK benefits. It's one of the major reasons why the UK government could face an "out" vote in the upcoming EU referendum.
Lets not blame the UK for all the problems associated with making it more difficult to move to another country. AHPRA made it almost impossible for UK qualified Midwives to obtain unconditional registration in Australia, and many Nurses are facing the same problems when applying to be registered in Australia. This, is in an area of extreme need, so the issues surrounding less critical occupations, be they in the UK or elsewhere, are likely to be affected also.
Being "out" of the EU may allow the UK to dictate it's own criteria for migrants, but the benefits of such a move may be outweighed by other restrictions.
I do, however, agree with Dave Brooking, that if implemented, only "citizens" should be included in the free movement program, and dual citizenship MUST be recognised as a result.
Immigration blog
I would be all for this with one caveat.
As we know it is easier to gain citizenship in some of these countries than others and so I would stipulate that such a right to visa free travel would only be allowed after a reasonable period of citizenship (or holder of an associated passport)- say the same 4 years it takes to gain citizenship in Australia.