In sharp contrast to this is the processing times for the family stream visas. The case in point is the Partner Temporary visa which has a similar service standard of 75% finalisations in 6 months. However, DIBP has achieved this only in about 1 in 5 cases with most being finalised in 12 months. RMAs have complained that DIBP has intentionally done this in order to spread out grants over the year and that some delays are due to applicants lodging applications without professional guidance due to the high deparmental application charges.
The sc457 Visa grants has seen a dramatic drop across the states. In 2013–14 the 457 primary visa grants for Western Australia (down 41.3 per cent to 8605) and Queensland (down 31 per cent to 7547) both fell. DIBP explained that this is in line with the slowing-down of the mining industry. The 457 primary visa grants for New South Wales (down 18.5 per cent to 19,693) and Victoria (down 14.8 per cent to 12,261) also fell.
The top three source countries for the 457 visa in 2013–14 were India with 23.3 per cent grants, followed by the UK (18.3 per cent) and the Republic of Ireland (7.2 per cent). These were the same top three source countries in 2012–13.
With the skilled migration program, India also dominates with almost 24,570 visa grants compared to the second place China with 8,340 grants and the United Kingdom with 6,650 Visa grants.
The total for the 2013–14 Migration Programme was 190,000 places, maintaining the 2011–13 outcome. The 2013–14 Skill stream outcome of 128,550 places accounted for 67.7 per cent of the total Migration Programme, including 47,450 places for the employer-sponsored category, which represented 36.9 per cent of the Skill stream outcome.
In terms of operating costs and revenue, the department seems to believe that it has struck a balance. Although the 2013–14 financial statements report a $98.8 million operating deficit compared with an $87.7 million operating deficit in 2012–13, the report explains that if ‘depreciating funding’ was allowed for then the 2013–14 result would have been a $14.4 million surplus.
Is this an impressive report card?
Please follow this link for the full report: http://www.immi.gov.au/about/reports/annual/2013-14/