System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Posted by on in General
Plaintiff M74/2018 v Minister for Home Affairs & Anor [2019] HCA 17
High Court of Australia
Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon & Edelman JJ
Migration law - plaintiff was 'unlawful non-citizen' in immigration detention - defendants relied on ss189 & 196 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) as authority to detain plaintiff "for the purpose of removal from Australia as soon as that becomes reasonably practicable" - plaintiff sought declaration detention not authorised by ss189 & 196 Migration Act and that detention was unlawful - plaintiff sought issue of 'writ of habeas corpus' or that he be released from custody - parties, pursuant to r27.08 High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), agreed on special case - questions of law stated - plaintiff provided 'inferences of fact' which it invited Court to draw - 'inconsistent statements' - whether plaintiff's options for removal exhausted - whether basis to apply minority view in Al-Kateb v Godwin [2004] HCA 37 - held: plaintiff's inferences not open - questions stated in special case did not arise.
Plaintiff M74/2018
Ali v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 93
Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Jagot, Burley & Lee JJ
Migration law - appellant's visa cancelled under ss501(3A)(a) & 501(3A)(b) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - first respondent's delegate affirmed decision - Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision - primary judge dismissed application for judicial review - applicant sought to appeal - applicant contended Court erred in finding Tribunal considered impediments to appellant if appellant returned to Fiji - appellant also contended that finding he had 'serious criminal record' was erroneous - grounds of appeal not raised before primary judge - whether to grant leave to appeal - held: leave to appeal granted - appeal dismissed.
Ali
BIR17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 850
Federal Court of Australia
Charlesworth J
Migration law - Minister's delegate refused to grant appellant a Temporary Protection (subclass 785) visa - Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed delegate's decision - primary judge dismissed application for judicial review - whether Tribunal's reasoning illogical - whether failure by primary judge 'to identify the alleged error' - credit - MZZJO v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 80 - held: appeal dismissed.
BIR17
Kaur v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 854
Federal Court of Australia
Markovic J
Migration law - first respondent's delegate refused to grant appellant Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa - Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision - Federal Circuit Court dismissed application for judicial review - whether denial of procedural fairness - whether erroneous 'adverse credibility findings' - whether credibility findings 'irrational, illogical or unreasonable' - whether inadequacy of reasons - whether bias - whether legal unreasonableness in sense in Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18 - whether primary judge erroneously made determinations 'in his Honour's own opinion' - held: appeal dismissed.
Kaur
APC16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 847
Federal Court of Australia
Anderson J
Migration law - first respondent's delegate refused to grant applicant a protection visa - Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision - Federal Circuit Court dismissed application for judicial review on basis applicant failed to attend application's hearing - applicant sought extension of time to appeal from Federal Circuit Court's dismissal of application to reinstate proceeding - adequacy of explanation for delay - whether decision of Federal Circuit Court 'attended by sufficient doubt to warrant' Court's reconsideration - held: Court not satisfied to grant extension of time - even if extension granted, Court would have refused leave to appeal against Federal Circuit Court's decision - application dismissed.
APC16

Source:  Benchmark https://benchmarkinc.com.au/web/

Last modified on
Hits: 2255 1 Comment
Rate this blog entry:
3

Posted by on in General

These regulations amend the Migration Regulations 1994 to prescribe bodies for the purpose of subsection 199B(3) of the Migration Act 1958.

Item was repealed on 20/06/2019, and is no longer in force
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00342

Last modified on
Hits: 1485 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
0

Posted by on in General

These regulations amend the Migration Regulations 1994 to remove the requirement for a chest x-ray for Unauthorised Maritime Arrival (UMA) minors who have turned eleven years of age since the grant of their last Subclass 785 (Temporary Protection) visa (TPV) or Subclass 790 (Safe Haven Enterprise) visa (SHEV) and who are applying for a subsequent TPV or SHEV. 

Item was repealed on 20/06/2019, and is no longer in force
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00185

Last modified on
Hits: 1535 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
0

Posted by on in General

This instrument amends the Migration (LIN 19/048: Specification of Occupations- Subclass 482 Visa) Instrument 2019 to rectify a drafting error by substituting the correct ABN for the NSW Rural Doctors Network Ltd, and to remove inapplicability condition 23 from the occupation of Horse Breeder (ANZSCO code 121316) in the Regional Occupation List to ensure that the instrument reflects the correct policy intention for this occupation.

Item was repealed on 20/06/2019, and is no longer in force
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00316

Last modified on
Hits: 2427 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
0

Posted by on in General

Yesterday the Hon Peter Dutton MP, Minister for Home Affairs said the following at a Press Conference in Sydney:

"... I am worried by this most recent court decision and I am awaiting advice at the moment in relation to our appeal prospects – either to the full Federal Court or to the High Court – so we'll wait and see what that legal advice has to say.

But it's inconceivable that a sovereign government doesn't have the right to say who is going to come to our country and don't have the right for those people who return back once medical assistance has been provided. Now an important point to make is that people were already coming to Australia for medical assistance where it was required and that's the case today.

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 1463 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
1
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio