Federal Court rejects “futility” as an argument.
The Federal Court recently ruled that the Administrative Appeals Tribunal failed to observe procedural fairness “by relying on other materials in its decision without giving notice of those materials to the appellant”.
Accordingly the the court allowed the appeal and ordered that the matter be remitted back to the AAT. In the matter a man who was convicted of manslaughter had his visa cancelled by DIBP on character grounds with the AAT subsequently confirming DIBPs decision.
In considering the appeal, the Court rejected an argument by DIBP that it was futile to remit the matter to the AAT because it was likely that the tribunal would arrive at the same decision.
Fijian national Amitesh Jagroop, 32, killed his wife, Nileshni Singh, on the night of her 19th birthday in June 2006 following a heated argument during which he pushed her causing her to fall and hit her head. Jagroop then chose not to call for help, but instead dragged her down an embankment where he left her to die.
Jagroop pleaded guilty to manslaughter in the Supreme Court and was jailed for 10 years but reduced on appeal. He was released on parole in 2011 and his visa was cancelled last year. But he has been fighting for more than 18 months to appeal the decision. This week a full bench of the Federal Court ordered the matter return to the Administrative Appeal Tribunal for rehearing.
...