First year RMAs face risk of deregistration
The Migration Alliance recently received a complaint from a first-year RMA facing the dilemma of losing registration because of the inability to meet the PRP-CPD requirement due to the lack of alternative providers.
First year RMAs are required to attend a Practice Ready Program (PRP) in their first year of registration in order for them to renew their registration. However, the OMARA has only approved 2 providers, MIA and Fragomen. Strangely, Fragomen offers the PRP in-house only thus leaving MIA with a monopoly. For some reason the MIA seems unable to keep up with the demand for the course suggesting perhaps that it is oblivious to the growth of the industry or incapable of supporting the growth. This is certainly another issue for current review of the OMARA to consider.
In a desperate plea for an additional grace period, the RMA has written to the OMARA stating:
“I have been trying for a while now to book for a PRP course which is a prerequisite for the first year registrants to renew their registration. Unfortunately, I was told that there is only one PRP provider in Sydney, which is MIA. All MIA PRP courses have been booked out for a while. They said that they can only have a limited number of students, and so they are not able to offer me a place before next year. My MARA registration is due for renewal [in early] 2015… If I am not able to complete this PRP on time for my registration renewal, may I request to kindly grant me reprieve until the first PRP course is available in the new year”
...