System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Recent blog posts

Posted by on in General
Sowa v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 111
Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Jagot, Bromwich & Thawley JJ
Migration - Minister's delegate cancelled appellant's visa under s501(3A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (mandatory cancellation decision) - Assistant Minister declined to revoke mandatory cancellation decision - primary judge dismissed judicial review application - whether erroneous failure to apply "assumption" in appellant's favour that it was "unlikely" non-refoulment obligations would be considered in 'future protection visa application' 'ahead of character grounds' - whether erroneous failure to understand future protection visa application could be refused 'purely on character grounds' under s65 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (Migration Act) - whether erroneous failure to 'expressly consider' s196 Migration Act's operation or that appellant could be 'indefinitely detained' under s189 Migration Act - whether erroneous failure to expressly consider s198 Migration Act's operation - Omar v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 279 - held: appeal dismissed.
Sowa
Russell v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 110
Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Nicholas, Bromwich & Burley JJ
Migration - Minister's delegate cancelled appellant's visa 'on character grounds' under s501(3A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - Minister's delegate declined to revoke cancellation decision - Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) found it did not have jurisdiction to hear 'merits review' application because application 'filed out of time' - primary judge dismissed judicial review application - whether AAT erred in finding it did not have jurisdiction - s500(6B) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - s14A Electronic Transactions Act 1999 (Cth) - 'concept of receipt' - whether concept of receipt extended to 'receipt within an information system' - held: appeal dismissed.
Russell
Vo v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 108
Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Derrington, Banks-Smith & Colvin JJ
Migration - appellant's son (My Nguyen) obtained visa to allow son 'to live and work in Australia' - appellant, as 'secondary applicant', sought visa on basis 'she was a member of Mr Nguyen's family unit' and within cl 187.311 Sch 2, Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) - Minister's delegate refused visa - Administrative Appeal's Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision - whether reg 1.05A Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) applied where 'a person is wholly or substantially reliant on more than one person' - held: Tribunal erroneously 'failed to discharge its statutory task' - jurisdictional error established - appeal allowed.
Vo
FER17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCAFC 106
Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Kerr, White & Charlesworth JJ
Migration - Minister's delegate refused to grant appellant a Safe Haven Enterprise Visa (SHEV) - Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA) affirmed delegate's decision - primary judge found IAA erred in affirming delegate's decision but refused relief on 'on discretionary grounds' - appellant appealed against refusal to grant relief - Minister's cross-appealed - whether primary judge correctly found jurisdictional error by IAA - meaning of "national" and "nationality" - 'the mischief rule' - whether primary judge erred in finding IAA erroneously applied 'wrong test' in finding appellant was 'national of Sri Lanka' - whether primary judge erred in finding error by IAA was jurisdictional - whether erroneous finding appellant 'lacked "genuineness or good faith"' - whether appellant 'misled IAA' - held: primary judge erred in refusal to grant appellant 'discretionary relief' - appeal allowed - cross-appeal dismissed.
FER17
BGQ18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1001
Federal Court of Australia
Flick J
Migration - Minister's delegate refused appellant's application for a Safe Haven Enterprise Visa - Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed delegate's decision - Federal Circuit Court of Australia refused judicial review application - whether erroneous failure to consider claims - 'imputed political opinion' - held: appeal dismissed.
BGQ18

Source: https://benchmarkinc.com.au/web/

Last modified on
Hits: 2743 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
0

Posted by on in General

The following message appears on the TRA website today, 4 July 2019:

The following changes will commence on 10 July 2019.

Change to Job Ready Journal monthly / quarterly journal process

  • TRA is changing the way it monitors a JRE participant’s work experience and skills development during steps 2-4 of the program. 

    ...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 3706 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
0

Posted by on in General

The Southern Inland RDA is now open, and accepting the applications for the 489 state nomination visa.

Please check the eligibility criteria before lodging the application.

The Skilled Occupations List is below: 

https://www.rdasi.org.au/assets/RegionalMigration/fa54c63574/Website-Version-1st-July-Skilled-Occupations-List-Updated.pdf

Other details and prerequisites for nomination can be found on their website:  

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 1945 1 Comment
Rate this blog entry:
1

Posted by on in General

The Migration Amendment (Strengthening the Character Test) Bill 2019 (the Bill) amends the Migration Act 1958 (the Migration Act) to provide grounds for non-citizens who commit serious offences, and who pose a risk to the safety of the Australian community, to be appropriately considered for visa refusal or cancellation. Specifically, the provisions of the Bill:

- amend the character test in section 501 of the Migration Act 1958 to provide grounds to consider visa cancellation or refusal where the non-citizen has been convicted of a serious crime.

- make consequential amendments to the definition of character concern in section 5C of the Migration Act 1958.

Source: Migration-Amendment-Strengthening-the-Character-Test-Bill-2019.pdf

and Migration-Amendment-Strengthening-the-Character-Test-Bill-2019-Explanatory-Memorandum.pdf

Last modified on
Hits: 2955 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
0

Posted by on in General

The Migration Amendment (Streamlining Visa Processing) Bill 2019 (the Bill) amends the Migration Act 1958 (the Act) to enable the Minister to specify groups of visa applicants who are required to provide one or more personal identifiers to make a valid application.

A biometric (termed ‘personal identifier’ in the Act), is a unique identifier that is based on individual physical characteristics, such as a facial image or a set of fingerprints, which can be digitised into a biometric template for automated storage and checking. Once ‘anchored‘ to a person’s biographic information, such as name, nationality and date of birth, a biometric adds significantly to verifying that a person is who they claim to be, and to linking an individual to security, law enforcement, and immigration information.

Source: Migration-Amendment-Streamlining-Visa-Processing-Bill-2019.pdf and 

Migration-Amendment-Streamlining-Visa-Processing-Bill-2019-Explanatory-Memorandum.pdf

Last modified on
Hits: 1924 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
0
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio

Immigration blog

Bizcover Banner
Migration Amendment for UK Armed Forces Personnel
The Migration Amendment (Status of Forces Agreemen...
Continue Reading...
Cancellation of Registration for Migration Agent for 5 years
The Office of the Migration Agents Registration Au...
Continue Reading...