Complaints continue into the NSW Government over botched application process
The following email has been sent into NSW Trade and Investment Migration Policy this morning by me:
Hi Lindsey
RMAs are not satisfied with the response provided by NSW Government.
The huge demand for applicants was perfectly predictable given the many months of closed applications prior to that. Lots of human cost to this mess, yet NSW officials seem relatively ok with their “new” system and are downplaying the major technical problems as glitches, etc. In short, this was a disastrous rollout of a fatally flawed system that resulted in a great amount of frustration and disappointment from people who only wanted the opportunity to apply for sponsorship.
How are RMA’s supposed to ethically decide which of multiple sc190 sponsorship applications goes in first, and what of an RMA’s legal liability if they agree to lodge this type of application and are prevented from doing so by NSW’s technical problems and/or not having time in the tiny window of opportunity to get all of their clients’ applications lodged?
Some RMA’s are taking the view that it is not ethical to recommend NSW state sponsorship at this point, given the random nature of who was able to get through or not during the 14 July debacle given all the problems.











