System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Posted by on in General
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1292
  • 0 Comments

Federal and High Court of Australia Migration Law summaries for 2 July 2020

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CED16 [2020] HCA 24
High Court of Australia
Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon and Edelman JJ
Migration law - delegate of Minister refused to grant first respondent protection visa - Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed delegate’s decision - Judge Street of Federal Circuit Court of Australia dismissed judicial review application - Derrington J of Federal Court of Australia allowed appeal against Judge Street’s decision - Minister appealed by special leave - appeal concerned meaning of "new information" - first respondent conceded ’Certificate’ could not satisfy condition in s473DE(1)(a)(ii) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (Migration Act) ’as interpreted in’ SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 81 ALJR 1190, Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZLFX [2009] HCA 31, Plaintiff M174/2016 [2018] HCA 16 and SZMTA [2019] HCA 3 - first respondent, however, contended Derrington J correct to find Certificate was "new information" and correct to conclude receipt of that "new information" caused Authority ’to fall into jurisdictional error’ by failure to perform ’procedural obligation’ which s473DB(1)(a) Migration Act imposed - whether Certificate could not satisfy description of "information" - whether Certificate was "document" - whether Certificate contained "information" within reference to "any documents or information" in definition of "new information" in s473DC(1) Migration Act - held: appeal allowed.
Minister
Ali v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 109
Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Collier, Reeves & Derrington JJ
Migration law - Minister cancelled appellant's partner visa on “character” grounds under s501(3A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (cancellation decision) - Assistant Minister was not satisfied of matters in ss501CA(4)(b)(i) & (ii) Migration Act - Assistant Minister refused to revoke cancellation decision - Steward J of Federal Court of Australia dismissed judicial review application - 'international non-refoulment obligations' - “another reason” - whether Assistant Minister erred in not being satisfied of matters in ss501CA(4)(b)(i) & (ii) Migration Act - whether necessary to determine non-refoulment obligations - whether permissible to defer consideration of non-refoulment obligations until 'any subsequent consideration' of protection visa application - “Failure to Consider Ground” - “The Identical Manner of Consideration Ground” - “Absence of Full Consideration Ground” - Hernandez v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 415 held: Assistant Minister's decision did not accord with requirements of s501CA(4) Migration Act - appeal allowed.
Ali
Walker v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 909
Federal Court of Australia
Bromwich J
Migration law - applicant’s temporary visa cancelled under s501(3A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (cancellation decision) - Minister refused to revoke cancellation decision - applicant sought judicial review - applicant challenged basis for Minister’s finding that applicant ’represented an unacceptable risk of harm’ outweighing considerations favouring revocation - use of ’past non-violent conduct and its violent outcome’ to find risk of violent conduct’s repetition - whether Minister’s decision ’legally unreasonable’ - Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18 - held: legal unreasonableness established - judicial review application upheld.
Walker

Source:  Benchmark

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
1

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Friday, 14 March 2025
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio