System Message:

Editor's Blog

Bringing RMAs articles of interest from news.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Posted by on in General
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 6280
  • 22 Comments

Is an ureasonably high English Language standard failing Australia’s skilled migration program objectives?

The migration skills list and the occupation ceilings sets the limits on the number of permanent visas granted each year under Australia’s skilled migration programme. However, many of the trades skills quotas are not being met. It is not clear if there is insufficient interest from applicants or if people are not bothering to apply due to the high English Language requirement.

Eight months of the financial year have passed and DIBPs recently updated statistics on occupation ceilings show that out of some 160,000 possible invitations that DIBP can issue in each programme year, only about 19,402 invitations have been sent as at 25 February 2015. The statistics are listed here: http://www.immi.gov.au/Work/Pages/SkillSelect/SkillSelect.aspx#tab-4 . You will have to click the Occupational Ceilings tab to view the data.

Occupational ceilings limit how many invitations to apply are issued by the Department of Immigration each year for general skilled migration for a particular occupation. Generally, applicants with an Expression of Interest in occupational groups which have reached their ceiling will not be invited to apply for a visa but however will remain in the EOI pool for two years from the date of submission, or until they are selected to apply when a fresh quota is issued.

Occupational ceilings do not apply to Employer Sponsored or Business Innovation and Investment visa subclasses and have now also been removed for State or Territory Nominated, visa subclasses. Effectively this means that states can nominate occupations for Skilled Nominated Subclass 190 and Skilled Regional Subclass 489 visas even if the ceiling has been reached.

Based on DIBPs current statistics, over 90 per cent of the jobs have barely hit 50 per cent of their quota. In fact, more than half the jobs on the list that numbers 75 occupations, have barely hit 3 per cent of their quota.

Here’s the shock list as at 25 February 2015

Occupations

Quota

Invites

Production Managers

3132

2

Painting Trades

2448

8

Metal Fitters/Machinists

6816

41

Plasterers

1980

14

Welding Trades

4482

39

Electronic Trades

2580

23

Motor Mechanics

6444

107

Plumbers

4464

76

Electricians

7854

140

Construction Managers

5178

94

 

In addition there are over a dozen occupations with a quota of 1000 like Tilers, Glaziers, Optometrists, Automotive Electricians and Air-conditioning/Refrigeration mechanics where invitations issued sit a single digit. Either they don’t find Australia attractive, or the skills assessment and language thresholds have made it impossible for them to give the process a go.

The other shock list for jobs with a quota of about 1000

Occupations

Quota

Invites

Sheetmetal Trades Workers

1000

0

Boat Builders and Shipwrights

1000

0

Automotive Electricians

1000

1

Precision Metal Trades Workers

1000

1

Wall and Floor Tilers

1110

2

Glaziers

1000

2

Electrical Distribution Trades

1000

2

 Have people given up on skill-select and trying other pathways? What is becoming of this policy of amassing the best and brightest from abroad to our abode through this precise system of social engineering?

Perhaps the Skillselect system is best suited for those in IT, Accounting, Engineering and Health Care. These occupations are well on their way to hit their quotas before the end of the financial year. The 5478 places for Accountants and the 5005 places for Software Programmers are about 70 per cent full.

The stated purpose of the occupational ceiling is to distribute the number of invitations across jobs so that, “the migration programme is not dominated by a small number of occupations.” However the current system is causing the program to be dominated by a few occupations. Perhaps it is because the best and brightest in their skill set who may have a suitable language level for their occupation just cannot meet the questionable high language bar imposed by DIBPs program. It is time for a rethink. Lowering the language threshold may be a start.

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
3

Comments

  • Guest
    Michael Tuesday, 03 March 2015

    There seems to be a misunderstanding about Canada's language requirements. You must take one of the required exams, and your score counts substantially toward whether you receive a visa. The US has a language criterion for Citizenship. Its worker program depends on whether the employer wants you or not. If you can't speak enough English to do the job, it's the employer's loss. Australia is the country that has the highest emphasis on English language.
    I think that many of the arguments for lower scores may be valid. However, Australians seem to feel that language is the key to acceptance in the community-at-large as opposed to acceptance in a particular ethnic community. There are more factors here than mere arguments about adding the numbers required for a visa.

  • Guest
    Mark Tuesday, 03 March 2015

    My experience is that the way the points are allocated for English language ability is having a detrimental effect on the program. There should no doubt be a minimum requirement that base level english be met. However the focus should primarily be on the skills, qualifications and experience that can be offered and these should be rewarded in greater proportion to that of English language ability.

Leave your comment

Guest Monday, 25 November 2024
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio