In a recent post, we discussed a case in which the Administrative Appeals Tribunal concluded that an applicant’s failure to truthfully disclose his record of criminal convictions in New Zealand (on his "incoming passenger cards") was a sufficient grounds to disqualify him from Australian citizenship - FBMR and Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, (2015) AATA 116 (2 March 2015). The AAT arrived at this determination even though none of the offences committed by the applicant had occurred in Australia – however, before his arrival the applicant had compiled a fairly impressive criminal record in New Zealand, that, as recounted in the AAT’s decision, included convictions for offences such as burglary, theft, possession and cultivation of drugs, unlawful possession of a firearm and serious traffic offences. While most of these offences had been committed a number of years before the application for citizenship was made, it was the failure to disclose the offences, rather than the offences themselves, that ultimately led the AAT to find that the applicant was not a person of “good character” and thus affirm the Department’s refusal of his application. (One might perhaps wonder why the applicant's actual criminal history itself was not accorded greater weight!)
By way of comparison, I now take up another recent case – Hasib v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) AATA 82 (13 February 2015) – where the AAT reached the opposite result, and found that an applicant’s criminal record involving 10 incidents of credit card fraud, committed in Australia, did not disqualify him from Australian citizenship.
The applicant in this case had what might be described as a “rocky” history following his initial arrival in Australia from Bangladesh on a student visa. The applicant first came to Australia in December 2003. In March 2006, his student visa was cancelled on “non-compliance grounds” involving the failure to satisfy attendance requirements of his course. The cancellation of the student visa was affirmed by the MRT. The applicant then remained in Australia as an unlawful non-citizen for a period of approximately one year, when he was granted a protection visa.
...