System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Posted by on in General
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v CED16 [2020] HCA 24
High Court of Australia
Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon and Edelman JJ
Migration law - delegate of Minister refused to grant first respondent protection visa - Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed delegate’s decision - Judge Street of Federal Circuit Court of Australia dismissed judicial review application - Derrington J of Federal Court of Australia allowed appeal against Judge Street’s decision - Minister appealed by special leave - appeal concerned meaning of "new information" - first respondent conceded ’Certificate’ could not satisfy condition in s473DE(1)(a)(ii) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (Migration Act) ’as interpreted in’ SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 81 ALJR 1190, Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZLFX [2009] HCA 31, Plaintiff M174/2016 [2018] HCA 16 and SZMTA [2019] HCA 3 - first respondent, however, contended Derrington J correct to find Certificate was "new information" and correct to conclude receipt of that "new information" caused Authority ’to fall into jurisdictional error’ by failure to perform ’procedural obligation’ which s473DB(1)(a) Migration Act imposed - whether Certificate could not satisfy description of "information" - whether Certificate was "document" - whether Certificate contained "information" within reference to "any documents or information" in definition of "new information" in s473DC(1) Migration Act - held: appeal allowed.
Minister
Ali v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 109
Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Collier, Reeves & Derrington JJ
Migration law - Minister cancelled appellant's partner visa on “character” grounds under s501(3A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (cancellation decision) - Assistant Minister was not satisfied of matters in ss501CA(4)(b)(i) & (ii) Migration Act - Assistant Minister refused to revoke cancellation decision - Steward J of Federal Court of Australia dismissed judicial review application - 'international non-refoulment obligations' - “another reason” - whether Assistant Minister erred in not being satisfied of matters in ss501CA(4)(b)(i) & (ii) Migration Act - whether necessary to determine non-refoulment obligations - whether permissible to defer consideration of non-refoulment obligations until 'any subsequent consideration' of protection visa application - “Failure to Consider Ground” - “The Identical Manner of Consideration Ground” - “Absence of Full Consideration Ground” - Hernandez v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 415 held: Assistant Minister's decision did not accord with requirements of s501CA(4) Migration Act - appeal allowed.
Ali
Walker v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 909
Federal Court of Australia
Bromwich J
Migration law - applicant’s temporary visa cancelled under s501(3A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (cancellation decision) - Minister refused to revoke cancellation decision - applicant sought judicial review - applicant challenged basis for Minister’s finding that applicant ’represented an unacceptable risk of harm’ outweighing considerations favouring revocation - use of ’past non-violent conduct and its violent outcome’ to find risk of violent conduct’s repetition - whether Minister’s decision ’legally unreasonable’ - Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18 - held: legal unreasonableness established - judicial review application upheld.
Walker

Source:  Benchmark

Last modified on
Hits: 1204 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
1

Posted by on in General

The General Skilled Migration (GSM) program for the 2019/20 financial year has now closed. 

The State & Territory nomination program will remain temporarily CLOSED until the Commonwealth Government s allocation of state nomination places for 2020-21 takes place. This means that State & Territory governments have no ability to nominate applicants in visa subclass 190 & visa subclass 491. 

The GSM 2020/21 program year is scheduled to re-open from early August however, changes to the composition of the Australian Migration program might be made in October under the new budget. 

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 4920 1 Comment
Rate this blog entry:
2

Posted by on in General

A nationwide study involving 5000 international students has found the majority are experiencing serious wage theft with three in four students earning below the minimum casual wage and one in four earning less than half the minimum.

‘International Students and Wage Theft in Australia’ is the latest report from UTS Law Associate Professor Laurie Berg and UNSW Associate Professor Bassina Farbenblum who co-direct the Migrant Worker Justice Initiative.

It builds on their 2016 national survey of temporary migrant workers. This new study finds that, despite efforts from the Fair Work Ombudsman over the last three years and stronger penalties against employers, it is still ‘business as usual’ in terms of the exploitation of international students.

Source: International-Students-Wage-theft.pdf 

Last modified on
Hits: 790 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
1

Posted by on in General

We are delighted to announce that SearchMyANZSCO, the leading migration tool in Australia and New Zealand, is onboard with us and is regarded as the most “user-friendly” platform for all migration agents.

We’d like to bring your focus on the convenience that SearchMyANZSCO provides for your daily tasks such as:

• Occupations Search

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 1025 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
1

Posted by on in General

Today the High Court unanimously allowed an appeal from a judgment of the Federal Court of
Australia. The issue raised by the appeal was whether an invalid certificate purportedly issued by a
delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection ("the Minister") under s 473GB of the
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) was "new information" within the meaning of s 473DC(1) of the Act. Section
473GB relevantly provides that the Minister may issue a written certificate certifying that certain
information given by the Secretary of the Department of Immigration and Border Protection ("the
Department") to the Immigration Assessment Authority ("the Authority") as part of the "fast track
review process" established by Pt 7AA of the Act should not be disclosed because it would ground a
claim of public interest immunity by the Commonwealth. Section 473DC(1) relevantly defines "new
information" to mean "documents or information" that "were not before the Minister when the Minister
made the decision [under review]" and that "the Authority considers may be relevant".


The first respondent's application for a protection visa was refused by a delegate of the Minister and this
decision was referred to the Authority for review under Pt 7AA of the Act. The "review material"
provided by a delegate of the Secretary of the Department to the Authority included a "Draft IMAPS
Identity Assessment Form" ("the Identity Assessment Form"). A certificate was purportedly issued
under s 473GB(5) ("the Certificate") certifying for the purpose of s 473GB(1)(a) that disclosure of the
information contained in the Identity Assessment Form would be contrary to the public interest
"because it is a Departmental working document". The Authority affirmed the delegate's decision and
an application for judicial review was dismissed by the Federal Circuit Court.

ORDER

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 1434 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
1
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio