System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Posted by on in General
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1979
  • 0 Comments

Federal Court cases - Migration Law - 4 September 2020

Hassan v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2020] FCCA 2385
Federal Circuit Court of Australia
Judge Baird
Migration law - applicant sought Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa under s65 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - Minister's delegate refused to grant visa - applicant at date of application did not satisfy criteria 3001,3003 & 3004, Schedule 3 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth (Migration Regulations) - Administrative Appeals Tribunal was not satisfied there were “compelling reasons” not to require applicant to apply for visa 'within 28 days of his last substantive visa' - Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision - applicant sought judicial review - whether Tribunal erroneously took irrelevant consideration into account - whether "genuineness question" concerning applicant's relationship with 'sponsoring partner' was irrelevant to whether 'Sch 3 criterion' should be waived - whether Tribunal erred by restricting its consideration of "genuineness question" to 'particular point in time' - whether Tribunal's consideration of "genuineness question" was material to its conclusion - finding of 'ulterior motive' - whether Tribunal erroneously failed to determine whether ulterior motive lapsed and relationship had matured into 'genuine and meaningful attachment' - subclass 820, Sch 2 Migration Regulations - Waensila v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 32 (Waensila) - held: Tribunal prevented by Waensila from restricting its consideration of "genuineness question" to particular point in time - jurisdictional error established - judicial review application upheld.
Hassan
AZC20 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2020] FCCA 2317
Federal Circuit Court of Australia
Judge Blake
Migration law - apprehended bias - Minister's delegate refused to grant applicant a Temporary Protection (Class XD) (Subclass 785) visa - Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed delegate's decision - whether Authority 'acted unreasonably' by failure to exercise, or to consider exercising, Authority's 'power to get new information under' s473DC(3) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (Migration Act) - whether Secretary provided Authority with material 'irrelevant and prejudicial' to applicant - whether Authority asked 'wrong question' or based decision on 'irrational finding' - whether failure by Authority 'to carry out a careful and balanced consideration of' claims against 'statutory criteria' - CNY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 50 - held: apprehended bias established - judicial review application upheld.
AZC20
DST18 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2020] FCCA 1813
Federal Circuit Court of Australia
Judge Driver
Migration law - Minister's delegate refused to grant applicant a Safe Haven Enterprise Visa (SHEV) - Authority affirmed delegate's decision - whether Authority 'misapprehended or overlooked important evidence' by applicant - "exceptional circumstances" - "new information" - whether Authority's application of s473DD Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (Migration Act) miscarried - whether erroneous 'failure to consider whether' applicant satisfied s36(2)(a) Migration Act - whether 'translation error' - whether translation error resulting in 'jurisdictional error' - whether 'illogical or irrational reasoning' resulting in jurisdictional error - held: Authority 'misapprehended or overlooked important evidence' by applicant - application of s473DD Migration Act miscarried - judicial review application upheld.
DST18

Source:  Benchmark

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Thursday, 18 April 2024
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio

Immigration blog

Bizcover Banner
Migration Amendment (Bridging Visas) Regulations 2024
The Migration Amendment (Bridging Visas) Regulatio...
Continue Reading...
High Court of Australia delivered a unanimous verdict in the case of LPDT v Minister
On April 10, 2024, the High Court of Australia ren...
Continue Reading...
Allianz Partners Travel Insurance Partner Discount Code for our members
Thank you for being a valued partner  At Mig...
Continue Reading...