System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Recent blog posts

Posted by on in General

Is it bad that I just mispelled the word MIGRATION in one of my newsletters?  I spelled it migation.  Which score would I get on an IELTS test for skilled migration purposes if I misspelled (or is it misspellt) the word 'migration'?

I would like to know how I would go in the written test.  The heading of the email was:

$55.00 online migation CPD modules - only pay if you pass the module - no risk

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 2497 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
0

Posted by on in General

A report in this morning from a Migration Alliance member, who wishes to remain unnamed, will be used as the basis of a complaint to the DIBP:

"I have always felt that the inconsistency with DIBP was an issue for Migration Agents. However, I have seen this once too often and feel I need to speak out.

A client (company) of mine insists on lodging their own nominations for their 457 visa applicants. This is not a problem and we have been happily completing our dealings for 457 visas over the past four years.  I also get copies of all nominations lodged.

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 4772 4 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
4

Posted by on in General

We have all seen cases where a client has sat the IETLS test multiple times to try and secure points and on many cases they fall just short of their target by 0.5 points and the scoring is not consistent. One time it could be in Speaking, the next Writing, Listening or Reading.  

The lack of openness and transparency in the IELTs testing system leaves the system open to allegations of misuse and abuse. Candidates are denied detailed information on their test results and have to re-sit the test time and time again.

IELTS has a statutory monopoly on English Language testing, and many institutions are getting rich in the process.  The IELTS language testing is worth over one billion dollars a year.

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 7006 8 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
3

Posted by on in General

The Federal Government said that the jailing of a former migration agent for immigration fraud sent a strong message to the industry that fraudulent and illegal behaviour will not be tolerated.

Ms Xiao Ying Wu (known as Amy Wu), was based in Sydney's Chinatown and pleaded guilty to forging immigration documents and defrauding her clients, who were seeking assistance with visa applications, in order to obtain more than $80 000.

She was sentenced today in the Downing Centre District Court to 21 months' imprisonment, with five months to be served, in relation to two Commonwealth charges of using false documents to obtain benefits.

She also received 18 months' imprisonment with five months' minimum term (to be served concurrently) for two charges under the NSW Crimes Act of dishonestly obtaining a financial advantage.

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 8394 14 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
2

Posted by on in General
I have just sent this email to the Office of the MARA's Director of Professional Development and Registration, Glenda Hutch.  Feel free to complete the survey and skew the results even more.  It's not like OMARA want real information.  They just want any old information so that it looks like they are interested in real results.  It's really just a triumph of form over substance.  If they want proper feedback on what people think about CPD's then why don't they leave the surveys up to private organisations who know how to conduct surveys properly and professionally to extract the right data and information the first time around?
 
Dear Glenda

With reference to the link in your email below 'CPD participant feedback - Distance Learning': https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/ltadnjanmar14

I just completed a 'dummy/imposter' survey off the link that you have sent out to CPD participants of LTA.  We have a huge number of participants.
 
I notice three things about this survey which concern me greatly:
1/ Survey Monkey is a non- Australian government based website based in the USA being used to collect information from random and unidentified persons (MARN is optional) regarding Legal Training Australia.   
2/ Anyone from anywhere in the world can complete the survey including me as I did just then as a test run.  I just completed the survey as an 'imposter' as a test by clicking on the link which means OMARA's results are already skewed.  I can see I am also able to re-do the survey by logging back on and doing it again at a different computer in my office.
3/ I can complete one (1) distance learning CPD module with LTA online, and yet I am able to go to the OMARA Survey Monkey web link and provide feedback regarding every single one of our online subjects if I want to, regardless of whether I have even completed them. 
 
Having a survey and making the link available to anyone who wants to participate is a risky approach as it means the survey designed lacks integrity which in turn means that the results lack validity.  In most cases, the people electing to participate are inherently biased in some fashion.   What's to stop me from running an active campaign against another provider by using their dedicated link and running an active campaign for my own business by using the link to the LTA survey?  The answer is nothing.  It is open to being rorted.

I can also see that the OMARA have not created a survey which prevents the following types of 'survey offenders' from participating:

1. “The Daydreamer” - this respondent does not read the questions or stay focused enough to understand what is being asked.  Known Accomplices: “The Woolgatherer,” “The Aloof,” “Mr. or Ms. Elsewhere”

2. “The Imposter” - this respondent provides false data to a) bias survey results or b) fraud data to qualify for a survey with an incentive being offered.  Known Accomplices: “The Survey Swindler,” “The Con,” “The Pretender”

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 4475 2 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
2
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio