Login / Join
Australian Immigration Daily News
Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au
- Font size: Larger Smaller
- Hits: 2535
- 0 Comments
Federal Court Cases - Migration Law - 13th August 2020
| FAK19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1124 Federal Court of Australia Charlesworth J Migration law - Minister's delegate cancelled applicant's visa ('cancellation decision') under s501(3A) of the Act (Migration Act) - other delegate refused to revoke cancellation decision - Tribunal upheld delegate's decision - applicant sought review - whether Tribunal should have understood that applicant was asserting that, if cancellation decision not revoked, applicant 'must be returned his home country' in circumstances giving rise to breach of 'non-refoulement obligations' - whether Tribunal erroneously treated non-refoulment obligations as 'synonymous' with fulfillment by applicant of 'criterion for a protection visa' - whether failure by Tribunal genuinely to consider 'and intellectually engage with' reason submitted by applicant for cancellation decision's revocation - whether error material - held: jurisdictional error established - application allowed. FAK19 |
| DUR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCA 1155 Federal Court of Australia Burley J Migration law - Minister's delegate refused to grant applicant a Safe Haven Enterprise visa - Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed delegate's decision - appellant appealed - whether failure by Authority to consider 'police and CID extortion claims' and if so whether failure was material - Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184 - held: failure to consider police and CID extortion claims established - jurisdictional error - appeal allowed. DUR16 |
| ANL17 v Minister for Immigration & Anor (No.2) [2020] FCCA 2166 Federal Circuit Court of Australia Judge Manousaridis Migration law - Minister's delegate refused to grant applicant a Safe Haven Enterprise visa - Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed delegate's decision - applicant sought remedies under s476 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - Court found applicant did not make out two grounds of appeal - Court found two appeal grounds 'reasonably arguable' - Court granted applicant leave to amend application to include a further ground - Court ordered that Minister and applicant 'file and serve written submissions' concerning merits of amended application and costs - consideration of submissions - “new information” - s473DD(a) (Migration Act) - whether erroneous consideration of whether 'exceptional circumstances' existed to justify mew information's consideration - whether failure to consider whether new information, if known to delegate, could have affected claims' consideration - whether error of the kind which White J found Authority had made in BVZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 958 - held: Authority made error of kind in BVZ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 958 - relief granted. ANL17 |
Source: https://benchmarkinc.com.au/web/
Immigration blog
The Department of Home Affairs has introduced Mini...
Important Updates to the Temporary Graduate Visa (...
The Migration Amendment (Relevant Assessing Author...
Effective from 13 December 2024, the updated Minis...
The Migration Amendment (Graduate Visas No. 2) Reg...