The Aid Industry and Humanitarian Organisations need to be mindful that the rest of the world does drift into "misery overload". There probably is an unprecedented number of catastrophes impacting populations that result in forced or necessary movements. This then results in increased "humanitarian need" etc around the globe. In the past few years somme of the better know hotspots are: Syria, Ebola, Eritrea, South Sudan, Central African Republic, Vanuatu, Nepal and the list goes on.
Human Trafficking IS part of the problem as this also encourages ambit migration which then adds to the problems of forced migration. Human Trafficking feeds off ease of entry into desirable destinations. Human Trafficking is now the third biggest money spinning industry in the world.
Humanitarian agencies frequently talk about "compassion" as a general idea without providing any real ideas as to how the limited resources associated with "compassion" may be best used. In my opinion, AID associated with humanitarian catastrophe is best apportioned quite specifically at immediate need e.g. in camps, for NGOs to better alleviate immediate suffering as best as possible. This is probably as good as it gets. The host countries of Pakistan, Jordan, Chad etc DO receive assistance with such. It becomes a global issue to pressure nation states that create unnecessary movements of people to act in such a way that their populations don't deed to leave. This is MUCH easier said than done. To intervene or to not intervene seems to backfire irrespective of whatever the decision. Fragile balances may exist in areas of teetering dysfunction.
...