System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Recent blog posts

Posted by on in General

Today, Legal Training Australia hosted a seminar with NSW Government discussing the State Nomination Programme for 2020/2021.

As we are all aware, State Nomination is competitive process, with criteria changing based on the economic needs as well as ensuring that Australian Citizens and PR holders are offerded jobs in the first instance.

The following update was provided by Zane Rebrojna in relation to NSW State Migration hosted together with Ross Ahmadzai from Legal Training Australia.

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 6931 1 Comment
Rate this blog entry:
12

Posted by on in General

As the COVID-19 restrictions ease, the question arises at to when it will be possible for international travellers to come to Australia.  Whilst international travel in general still some time away, recent announcement by the Prime Minister Scott Morrison suggests that international students may be able to travel to Australia as early as July. 

Roadmap to a Covid Safe Australia (https://www.pm.gov.au/sites/default/files/files/covid-safe-australia-roadmap.pdf) reveals that trans- Tasman, Pacific and international student travel should be included as part of the last stage of lifting Australia out of the lockdown. However, the implementation is to take place as early as July this year.

Australia has long been one of the top ranking countries in the world when it comes to the lucrative education sector, where learners come to study and stay temporarily to achieve an internationally recognised qualification.

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 2546 1 Comment
Rate this blog entry:
17

Posted by on in General

With COVID-19 pandemic still sweeping much for the world, options for individuals to remain in Australia became more limited (yes, even more limited than they were prior to the pandemic).

With 90 visa subclasses to choose from, one would think that there is a solution to every scenario.  The reality however is quite contrary.  Take example of a student visa applicant, if they want to lodge another student visa in Australia and this is their second onshore application, they will be faced with an additional levy known as STAC or Secondary Temporary Application Charge.  Using the same example, an individual wanting to apply for a student visa whilst holding a Bridging Visa, cannot do so whilst in Australia unless they meet Schedule III criteria (in simple words, they are not a holder of a substantive visa and therefore they cannot lodge another student visa in Australia unless compelling or compassionate grounds exist).

We then move on the secondary issue which are the conditions that many temporary visa holders will have attached to their visa.  This means that there are certain things that they can and cannot do as a holder of that visa.

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 13209 5 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
15

Posted by on in General

The Federal Court, through senior officers of the Court, became aware in late March 2020 that the names of some litigants who had commenced protection visa proceedings in the Federal Court and the Federal Circuit Court could be accessed on the Commonwealth Courts Portal through Federal Law Search. Those web-based services are managed under the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976.

The access that could be obtained to the names of some litigants was or could be, if obtained, publication contrary to the Migration Act s 91X. That provision provides that a federal court must not publish (in electronic form or otherwise) the name of a person in a proceeding relating either to their application for a protection visa or related bridging visa, or to the cancellation of such a visa. This state of affairs is referred to in these terms of reference as a ‘data breach’ or ‘the data breach’.

Source: S91X.pdf

Last modified on
Hits: 3129 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
9

Posted by on in General
ERY19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 569
Federal Court of Australia
Stewart J
Migration law - applicant sought judicial review of Minister's 'personal decision', under s501(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (Migration Act), to refuse applicant a Protection (Class XA) visa - Minister was not satisfied applicant passed applicant 'character test' on basis of 'Interpol notice' concerning applicant - whether open to Minister 'to reasonably draw the inference that the applicant would present' risk to Australian community or segment of Australian community - whether misconstruction and misapplication of s501(6)(h) - whether Minister failed to consider information in Department's possession - whether Minister's decision 'legally unreasonable' - 'community expectation' - s195A Migration Act - 'legal unreasonableness' - held: Court not satisfied Minister could 'reasonably have inferred' from 'Interpol Red Notice' that applicant would present risk to Australian community or a segment of it - legal unreasonableness established - Minister's decision set aside.
ERY19
Kim v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 583
Federal Court of Australia
Gleeson J
Migration law - Minister's delegate declined to revoke cancellation of applicant's Class BB Subclass 155 (Five Year Resident Return) visa - Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision - applicant sought judicial review - applicant contended Tribunal failed to take into account relevant consideration 'in addressing the extent of impediments' if he 'were removed' - Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Buadromo [2012] FCAFC 101 - held: Tribunal erred by failure to consider impact of health of applicant 'as required by' cl 14.5(1)(a) Direction No. 79 - jurisdictional error established - judicial review application upheld - matter remitted.
Kim
CBI18 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2020] FCCA 1018
Federal Circuit Court of Australia
Judge Heffernan
Migration law - Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed refusal to grant applicant a Safe Haven Enterprise (Class XE) (Subclass 790) Visa - applicant sought judicial review - whether Authority failed to consider 'relevant material' - ss473CB(1)(b), 473CC & 473DD(b) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - held: Authority failed to consider relevant material consisting of letter which was provided by wife of applicant - letter was 'highly material' to applicant's claims - constructive failure to exercise jurisdiction established - jurisdictional error established - orders made for issuing of writs in nature of certiorari and mandamus.
CBI18
FJV18 v Minister For Home Affairs & Anor [2020] FCCA 1032
Federal Circuit Court of Australia
Judge Young
Migration law - Immigration Assessment Authority affirmed decision of Minister's delegate to refuse to grant applicant a Safe Haven Enterprise Visa - Authority not satisfied, for purpose of s5J(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (Migration Act), there was 'real chance of persecution which relates to all areas of Pakistan' - Authority concluded applicant would not face real chance of persecution if 'relocated to Islamabad' - 'reasonableness of relocation' - question of relocation's reasonableness arising in relation to consideration of complementary protection, not the assessment of whether person is a refugee - CS17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 68 - s36(2B)(a) Migration Act - 'level of generality' of Authority's approach to relocation question - held: Authority did not discharge statutory task to examine material and to make findings concerning whether applicant and family, 'could as a matter of practical reality', relocate to Islamabad - jurisdictional error established - writs of certiorari and mandamus issued.
FJV18

Source: https://benchmarkinc.com.au/web/

Last modified on
Hits: 2092 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
9
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio