RMAs oral notice to DIBP is valid

Court finds that oral notification to DIBP to vary the RMAs preferred method of communications is sufficient.
The recent Federal Court’s decision suggests that no further written notification to DIBP is required to vary original written notice to DIBP. Oral notice is sufficient, provided all the correct communication information (i.e. email, fax and/or address) had been properly provided to DIBP previously.
Briefly, in that case, the applicant’s visa refusal decision was sent by the DIBP Case Officer (CO) to the RMAs postal address whilst the RMA was overseas. The RMA was unaware of this notice. By the time the RMA returned from overseas, the timeframe for lodging an appeal to the Tribunal had expired. After a series of failed appeals the applicant took the matter to the Federal Court.
...