Case Illustrates that Strong Showing of Hardship Necessary for Schedule 3 Waiver

Is it hard to persuade the Department and the Tribunal that the Schedule 3 criteria should be “waived” so that an applicant can apply for a Subclass 820 Partner visa while onshore in Australia, and obtain a Bridging Visa A to remain in Australia with her/his spouse or partner while the application is being processed?
And is it hard to persuade the Federal Courts that the Tribunal has fallen into jurisdictional error when it has determined that “compelling reasons” do not exist for not applying the Schedule 3 criteria?
The answers to these questions are “yes!” and “YES!!!”.
...