The Australian Embassy in Brazil’s Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/AustraliaNoBrasil/) recently posted news about the new Australian Skilled Occupations List for 2017. They placed on the same post, a web-link to a site called “BrazilAustralia”.
The owners of this site are not registered migration agents.
The wording is in Portuguese and is targeting the Brazilian market.
Below are some remarks from the website with Google translator’s help:
"..Important: For several professions in demand in Australia you can not apply directly for permanent residence, you need local experience to become eligible for the immigration process. For example doctors need to work for at least 1 year in Australia in order to have a valid medical record here.. ..."; "...It is a temporary residence, but after two years meeting the criteria you can get permanent residence in Australia. ..."; "...financial evidence ranging from AUD $ 10,000 for single applications to AUD $ 45,000 for family with 2 children ...."; "... permanent residence will also be easier for foreign students ...".
Migration Alliance is aware that there is a Registered Migration Agent operating in this geographic location. Our story continues below this image....
We advise visa applicants to not use the above company for Australian immigration advice and assistance as the operators are not Registered Migration Agents. We advise people seeking immigration assistance in Australia to use a Registered Migration Agent.
Registered Migration Agents can be located at www.mara.gov.au
There are many unregistered migration operators in the market but because the current visa system allows non RMAs to prepare and submit visa applications, RMAs have to compete against unqualified agents.
Migration Alliance continues to receive complaints from RMAs and ex-clients of unregistered agents, neither group understanding why RMAs have to spend so much time and money to upkeep their registration and CPD, but the system at the same time allows non RMAs to prepare and submit visa applications. This is simply not fair to the RMAs who put in effort to operate lawfully and properly, irrespective of where they live in the world.
If there is no assurance to unwitting consumers that their application must be lodged by a competent person with sound knowledge (an RMA) then we do not understand people need to be RMAs in the first place.
Below are some comments from MA member RMAs:
"If it is that simple, we can all be simply given an operating ID/account to access the visa system to prepare and submit the applications".
"What is the point of RMAs if your next door neighbour can operate the system him/herself? We have no value to perform yet we are expected to act professionally and ethically when all the time the non RMAs are acting unprofessionally and unethically. Why?"
"I think the Australian visa system needs to follow the NZ model where only licensed immigration advisers can operate the system. No one else can. This will assure the licensed advisers the migration work and only in this situation it is justified to ask the advisers to upkeep themselves professionally and ethically."
"I think the Australian visa system should only allow the RMAs to prepare and submit the visa applications like the NZ licensed immigration advisers. The non RMAs should not be allowed to operate the system not unless they become RMAs. Exceptions can apply in partner visa, student visa, etc where non RMAs are allowed to operate themselves.
I think the assurance of RMAs to operate the visa system will regulate the market much better by screening out the non RMA activities confined to those exceptions. Right now, we already have many RMAs in the market both local and abroad we don't need the non RMAs to do our work which we are supposed/trained to do. There is no future for us the RMAs if non RMAs keep doing what they are doing now because we are not assured by the visa system. This loophole needs to be closed."
"Right now the way I see it, is the non RMAs who have the say not us the RMAs. Is this healthy to you?"
For us and for consumer protection, RMAs need to operate within a healthy, regulated market.
The government needs to stem out the non-RMAs operating in the market, not promote them.