System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Posted by on in General
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 916
  • 0 Comments

Federal Court Decisions for the week ending 1 July 2021

Broadbent v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 116
Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Nicholas, Wigney & Anderson JJ
Migration law - Minister's delegate cancelled applicant's Class WR Subclass 070 Bridging R (Removal Pending) visa under s501(3A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - Minister refused to revoke cancellation - SC Derrington J, of Federal Court of Australia, refused judicial review application - applicant sought to appeal - whether to grant extension of time to appeal - whether Minister lacked power under s501CA Migration Act to revoke visas cancellation - whether erroneous failure to consider 'evidence of significance' concerning question whether to revoke visa's cancellation - whether applicant made representation that he was, or might be a Zambian citizen - whether Minister required to consider applicant's connection with Zambia - whether misconstruction of s256 Migration Act - held: extension of time to appeal refused.
Broadbent
Chetcuti v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 98
Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Logan, Charlesworth & Wheelahan JJ
Migration law - Minister cancelled appellant's visa under s501(3) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (cancellation decision) - appellant challenged cancellation decision - Bromberg J, of Federal Court of Australia, dismissed judicial review application - appellant contended Minister had misunderstood operation of 501(3) Migration Act 'by believing it precluded him from' effecting procedural fairness rules - appellant also contended Minister was 'precluded from re-exercising the power to cancel' visa where a previous Minister had declined to cancel the visa ('2012 decision') 'and no relevant new fact or circumstance had arisen since' 2012 decision - appellant also contended Minister failed to have regard to 'mandatory relevant consideration' - whether to grant leave to raise new appeal grounds - whether 'separate powers' conferred between s501(2) Migration Act and s501(3) Migration Act - whether Minister was 're-exercising power' when cancellation decision made - held: appeal dismissed.
Chetcuti

Source:  Benchmark

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
1

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Friday, 29 March 2024
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio

Immigration blog

Bizcover Banner
Migration Amendment (Removal and Other Measures) Bill 2024
The Migration Amendment (Removal and Other Measure...
Continue Reading...
Migration (Class of Persons for Nil VAC-LIN 24/008) Specification 2024
The Migration (Class of Persons for Nil VAC—LIN 24...
Continue Reading...
Pacific Engagement (Subclass 192) visa ballot
Introducing the Pacific Engagement Visa Initiative...
Continue Reading...