System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Posted by on in General
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1188
  • 0 Comments

High Court of Australia Immigration Summaries 11 March 2021

Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v AAM17 [2021] HCA 6
High Court of Australia
Kiefel CJ; Keane, Gordon, Edelman & Steward JJ
Migration law - first respondent sought Protection (Class XA) visa - delegate of Minister refused application - Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision - first respondent sought judicial review - first respondent unrepresented but obtained interpreter's assistance - Judge Street, of Federal Circuit Court of Australia, dismissed application - Judge Street's orders, but not ex tempore 'oral reasons', were translated for first respondent's benefit - first respondent appealed - first respondent unrepresented - Mortimer J found no error in Judge Street's reasons or Tribunal's reasons - Mortimer J allowed appeal on basis that the failure to have oral reasons translated for first respondent's benefit 'constituted a denial of procedural fairness' - appellant appealed - 'procedural fairness' - 'practical justice' - whether first respondent deprived of opportunity to formulate argument due to failure to translate 'ex tempore' reasons - held: appeal allowed.
Minister for Immigration
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v AAM17 [2021] HCA 6
High Court of Australia
Kiefel CJ; Keane, Gordon, Edelman & Steward JJ
Migration law - first respondent sought Protection (Class XA) visa - delegate of Minister refused application - Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision - first respondent sought judicial review - first respondent unrepresented but obtained interpreter's assistance - Judge Street, of Federal Circuit Court of Australia, dismissed application - Judge Street's orders, but not ex tempore 'oral reasons', were translated for first respondent's benefit - first respondent appealed - first respondent unrepresented - Mortimer J found no error in Judge Street's reasons or Tribunal's reasons - Mortimer J allowed appeal on basis that the failure to have oral reasons translated for first respondent's benefit 'constituted a denial of procedural fairness' - appellant appealed - 'procedural fairness' - 'practical justice' - whether first respondent deprived of opportunity to formulate argument due to failure to translate 'ex tempore' reasons - held: appeal allowed.
Minister for Immigration (WML))
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v EFX17 [2021] HCA 9
High Court of Australia
Kiefel CJ; Gageler, Keane, Edelman & Steward JJ
Migration law - Minister cancelled respondent's visa under s501(3A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - appeal concerned 'meaning and operation of' s501CA(3) Migration Act - Full Court of Federal Court of Australia held sub-section required that 'recipient be capable of understanding the information and invitation' to make representations and that Minister, or delegate of Minister, personally give information and invitation to recipient - Minister appealed - relevance of capacity of respondent to understand - whether personal performance of duties by Minister or delegate required - held: Minister's appeal grounds allowed - however appeal dismissed on basis invitation to make representations in letter from delegate of Minister 'did not provide a way to ascertain' period in which representations were required to made in accordance with Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) - notice of contention upheld - appeal dismissed.
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

Source:  Benchmark

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Monday, 25 November 2024
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio