System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Posted by on in General
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1214
  • 0 Comments

High Court of Australia Immigration Summaries 11 March 2021

Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v AAM17 [2021] HCA 6
High Court of Australia
Kiefel CJ; Keane, Gordon, Edelman & Steward JJ
Migration law - first respondent sought Protection (Class XA) visa - delegate of Minister refused application - Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision - first respondent sought judicial review - first respondent unrepresented but obtained interpreter's assistance - Judge Street, of Federal Circuit Court of Australia, dismissed application - Judge Street's orders, but not ex tempore 'oral reasons', were translated for first respondent's benefit - first respondent appealed - first respondent unrepresented - Mortimer J found no error in Judge Street's reasons or Tribunal's reasons - Mortimer J allowed appeal on basis that the failure to have oral reasons translated for first respondent's benefit 'constituted a denial of procedural fairness' - appellant appealed - 'procedural fairness' - 'practical justice' - whether first respondent deprived of opportunity to formulate argument due to failure to translate 'ex tempore' reasons - held: appeal allowed.
Minister for Immigration
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v AAM17 [2021] HCA 6
High Court of Australia
Kiefel CJ; Keane, Gordon, Edelman & Steward JJ
Migration law - first respondent sought Protection (Class XA) visa - delegate of Minister refused application - Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision - first respondent sought judicial review - first respondent unrepresented but obtained interpreter's assistance - Judge Street, of Federal Circuit Court of Australia, dismissed application - Judge Street's orders, but not ex tempore 'oral reasons', were translated for first respondent's benefit - first respondent appealed - first respondent unrepresented - Mortimer J found no error in Judge Street's reasons or Tribunal's reasons - Mortimer J allowed appeal on basis that the failure to have oral reasons translated for first respondent's benefit 'constituted a denial of procedural fairness' - appellant appealed - 'procedural fairness' - 'practical justice' - whether first respondent deprived of opportunity to formulate argument due to failure to translate 'ex tempore' reasons - held: appeal allowed.
Minister for Immigration (WML))
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v EFX17 [2021] HCA 9
High Court of Australia
Kiefel CJ; Gageler, Keane, Edelman & Steward JJ
Migration law - Minister cancelled respondent's visa under s501(3A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - appeal concerned 'meaning and operation of' s501CA(3) Migration Act - Full Court of Federal Court of Australia held sub-section required that 'recipient be capable of understanding the information and invitation' to make representations and that Minister, or delegate of Minister, personally give information and invitation to recipient - Minister appealed - relevance of capacity of respondent to understand - whether personal performance of duties by Minister or delegate required - held: Minister's appeal grounds allowed - however appeal dismissed on basis invitation to make representations in letter from delegate of Minister 'did not provide a way to ascertain' period in which representations were required to made in accordance with Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) - notice of contention upheld - appeal dismissed.
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

Source:  Benchmark

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Thursday, 09 January 2025
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio

Immigration blog

Bizcover Banner
Summary of Ministerial Direction No. 111: Changes to Student Visa Processing
The Department of Home Affairs has introduced Mini...
Continue Reading...
Migration Legislation Amendment (Graduate Visas No. 2) Instrument (LIN 24/086) 2024
Important Updates to the Temporary Graduate Visa (...
Continue Reading...
Migration Amendment (Relevant Assessing Authorities and Other Matters) Instrument 2024
The Migration Amendment (Relevant Assessing Author...
Continue Reading...
Improved Visa Framework for Religious Workers
Effective from 13 December 2024, the updated Minis...
Continue Reading...
Migration Amendment (Graduate Visas No. 2) Regulations 2024
The Migration Amendment (Graduate Visas No. 2) Reg...
Continue Reading...