Login / Join
Australian Immigration Daily News
Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au
- Font size: Larger Smaller
- Hits: 2065
- 0 Comments
Federal Court Summaries - Migration Law - 20 August 2020
| XFCS v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 140 Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia Moshinsky, SC Derrington & Colvin JJ Migration law - Minister's delegate cancelled appellant's visa 'as required by' s501(3A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - Minister's delegate decline to revoke cancellation - Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision - O'Bryan J of the Federal Court of Australia dismissed appellant's judicial review application - appellant appealed - appellant contended primary judge erroneously failed to find Tribunal had 'ignored submissions advanced' on applicant's behalf in email sent by applicant's lawyer to Tribunal ('email submissions') - appellant also contended that primary judge erroneously failed to find that failure by Tribunal to consider the submissions was 'material to the outcome' of appellant's judicial review application - held: no error in decision of primary judge - appeal dismissed. XFCS |
| DXQ16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1184 Federal Court of Australia Steward J Migration law - appellants claimed to be "stateless" - appellants were granted protection visas - Minister suspected appellants were not stateless but 'citizens of Iran' - appellants admitted they were not stateless - Minister's delegate cancelled appellants' visas under s109 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (Migration Act) - Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed cancellation decision - Judge Street of Federal Circuit Court dismissed judicial review applications - appellants appealed - whether Tribunal 'had regard to' best interests of appellant's children 'as a primary consideration' - whether Tribunal erred in reliance on 'I.T.O.A. process' - s101 Migration Act - whether Court bound to follow decisions concerning what was decided in Teoh v. Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1994] FCA 1017 - 'the Teoh ground' - held: Tribunal failed to have regard to children's best interests as a primary consideration - appeal allowed - matter remitted. DXQ16 |
| AUE16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCA 1168 Federal Court of Australia Bromberg J Migration law - Minister's delegate refused to grant appellant a protection visa - Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision - Judge Blake of Federal Circuit Court of Australian dismissed judicial review application - appellant appealed - whether failure to give 'meaningful consideration' of appellant's claim of 'fear of harm' - whether application of 'wrong test' - whether failure to consider integer of claim concerning appellant's brother - held: Tribunal failed to give meaningful consideration to claim of fear of harm of 'increased violence in the context of forthcoming elections in Pakistan' - appeal allowed. AUE16 |
Sourece: https://benchmarkinc.com.au/web/
Immigration blog
Migration Alliance acknowledges the Migration Inst...
The Migration Legislation Amendment (Specified Wor...
The Migration Amendment (Status of Forces Agreemen...
The Office of the Migration Agents Registration Au...
The Workplace Rights Guide provides essential info...