System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Posted by on in General
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1386
  • 0 Comments

Federal Court Summaries - Migration Law - 21 Feb 2020

Fualau v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 11
Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia
Murphy, Davies & O'Bryan JJ
Migration - first respondent's delegate declined to revoke mandatory cancellation, under s501(3A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth), of applicant's Special Category Temporary (Subclass 444) visa - Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision - primary judge dismissed judicial review application - applicant, under r36.05 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), sought extension of time to appeal - appellant contended primary judge erroneously failed to find Tribunal had not accorded procedural fairness to him - explanation for delay - prospects of success - whether utility in granting extension of time - held: extension of time to appeal refused.
Fualau
Nguyen v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 127
Federal Court of Australia
Banks-Smith J
Migration law - Minister's delegate declined to revoke mandatory cancellation, under s501(3A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth), of applicant's Class BB Subclass 155 - Five Year Resident Return visa - Tribunal affirmed delegate's decision - applicant sought review - applicant contended Tribunal failed to complete statutory task by failure to consider his submission that Prisoners Review Board of Western Australia (Board) granted him parole under Sentence Administration Act 2003 (WA) ('Parole Decision') - applicant contended that Parole Decision was e 'drawn to the Tribunal's attention' in 'statement of facts, issues and contentions' ('SOFIC') but that Tribunal had not referred to it - held: material error by Tribunal established - Tribunal's decision set aside.
Nguyen
AEJ17 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2020] FCCA 261
Federal Circuit Court of Australia
Judge McNab
Migration law - first respondent's delegate refused to grant applicant a Temporary Protection Visa (class XD) (subclass 785) - Authority affirmed delegate's decision - applicant sought judicial review under s476(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - whether Authority failed adequately to consider whether it was 'reasonably practicable' for applicant to return to Kabul - s36(2B) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - held: Authority failed in 'review function' under s473CC Migration Act due to its failure to properly consider reasonableness of applicant's return to Kabul - material error established - Authority's decision set aside.
AEJ17

Source:  Benchmark https://benchmarkinc.com.au/web/

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Tuesday, 26 November 2024
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio