System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Posted by on in General
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 3562
  • 5 Comments

Conflict between the Code of Conduct and the OMARA website

Part 2.12 of the Code of Conduct for RMAs can be found below.  RMAs must not imply the existence of a relationship with the Department, for example, by using terms such as 'Australian Government Registered'.   Read Part 2.12 below:

Page-from-Code-of-Conduct.pdf

Below is the print out of RMA, Liana Allan's profile from the OMARA website which states:

Australian Goverment

Office of the Migration Agents Registration Authority

Registered Migration Agent Details

LIANA JUSTINE ALLAN

Liana-OMARA-listing.pdf

Effectively the OMARA are putting RMAs in breach of the Code of Conduct by advertising that the RMA is Australian Government Registered.

Any comments?

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
5

Comments

  • Guest
    Wei S Monday, 25 July 2016

    Well spotted - whoever found this. Maybe the DIBP and OMARA can get their own ship in order before it starts trying to fix our ships. Also, I have been to Liana Allan's listing on the OMARA website and it says something even more ridiculous:
    Registration details

    Agents must apply for registration every year so that they can continue to practice.

    Most recent registration started on 23 Aug 2016.

    How can a registration have been 'started' (past-tense) before the date has actually arrived?

  • Michael Jeremy
    Michael Jeremy Monday, 25 July 2016

    Yes.

    The sooner this dated regulatory system is put out of its misery the better.

    The whole "thing" of the "registered migration agent" is a dinosaur.

    MJ

  • Guest
    Robert Thursday, 28 July 2016

    Agreed, it should be case that a person becomes registered - and stays registered until that registration is cancelled or relinquished.

    Rather than have RMA's re-apply each year (simply to justify omara's expense account) registration should be cancelled when fault is proven (perhaps in a court of Law?). Once cancelled/sanctioned a re-applicaiton would be needed, naturally, in order to resume practicing.

    Results?

      Much smaller registration charges as omara don't have to go through the farce of the re-applicaitons. Omara require a much reduced budget and fewer staff (perhaps they could go back to being case officers, by all accounts the dept needs them there). abolition of "red tape". Omara have much more time to go after the unregistered hacks using the term "migration agent" (perhaps the same ones that the dept helps so much overseas) Greatly increased transparency/consistency in sanctions (if a court process is used)

    perhaps the dept/omara will also then have the time to learn how to refer to their constituency better - let's say, distinguishing an RMA from someone who is not - rather than constantly using the ambiguous term "migration agent".

  • Guest
    Justin Rickard Monday, 25 July 2016

    2.12 says "when advertising" so there is not really a conflict that I can see in this instance to be fair

  • Guest
    Olivia Monday, 25 July 2016

    Justin, I printed off my Omara registration and put it in a frame. Is that advertising?
    Is the Omara website a form of advertising?
    I think it is.

Leave your comment

Guest Saturday, 30 November 2024
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio