The implicit suggestion of the Productivity Commission’s investigation and the view of the quarters that support it is that migrants enter Australia and take advantage of all it has to offer namely its well-developed health and education facilities, and infrastructure and therefore they should pay for that privilege.
Radio reports even had some suggesting that migration agents be allowed to facilitate loans for visa applicants so that they can make the application.
How exactly does all this help attract the best and the brightest, to support the Australian economy over the long term?
It is time for a reality check. Skilled migrants contribute to the economy over the long-term. Independent modelling by the Migration Council of Australia (MCA) earlier this year pointed out that higher skilled migration numbers would boost Australia’s economy by $1.6 trillion in a single year.
Another reality is that Australia’s relatively small talent base requires local businesses to compete with other countries for foreign talent. Skills are a valuable resource. Skills grow businesses and the economy. Don't turn away talent with short-sighted policies.
Any suggestion that looks to a single initial contribution is thus missing the wood for the tree. It fails to consider the continuous contribution over years of skilled work. Skills build wealth.
Prime Minister Tony Abbot has had to quell the talk of this ‘paid-visa scheme’ with an announcement yesterday stating that the Coalition government is unlikely to adopt such a scheme.
"Everyone knows that the immigration policy of this government is fairly and squarely based on what is in the best interests and what is in accordance with the best values of our country," Mr Abbott said. "That's the way it is and that's the way it will stay as far as I'm concerned."
To support this and nudge the Productivity Commission in a sensible direction, the Migration Alliance is putting together a submission and would like to include the ideas of members.
Please send submissions to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .
A draft submission will be circulated to members via email in the coming weeks. The lead-time for submissions is short so we would appreciate it if all comments and ideas that RMAs would like included arrive to us via email by 5pm on the 1 June 2015. This is just under a month away. All submissions to the Productivity Commission are due by 12 June 2014, which will leave just under two weeks for MA to incorporate all RMA submissions, ideas and thoughts into it's larger submission
I am not against migration because we are all migrants to Australia. The problem is however, is that the skilled migration program is not doing its job. This is shown by the fact that skilled migrants are being used as a cheaper substitute to citizens within Australia. Subsequently, there is high youth unemployment and a decrease in wages. Type in "457 visa" and "ICT" in Google and you will get online articles proving this point. This is also exacerbated by the fact that visas in Australia are uncapped. I agree that immigrants contribute to a lot within this country but as it is uncapped, migrants are literally swamping the job market making it hard for entry level workers to gain a foothold into the workforce (because their financial expectations are lower so they will ask for less compared with an entry level worker) and also putting a strain to existing infrastructure (because unless if they are located in areas where they are actually needed (the country or rural areas), they are placing a burden in areas such as Sydney, Melbourne etc. which results in delays and overcrowding in transport, schools etc.
Putting a paid visa scheme does help a bit but I'd rather put a visa cap or a tariff for every visa person hired or outsourced for every Australian citizen lost
Australia is fast becoming a lifestyle choice that I suspect many foreigners will not be prepared to make, no matter how enticing - we live in interesting (opportunistic and short-sighted ) times...