sc457 review applicants do not require 'approved nomination'
An appeal to the Full Federal Court has resulted in the judgement that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to review an sc457 application whilst reviews are pending for the nomination. The court accepted that “it is sufficient at the time of the making of the application for review of the visa decision there is pending an application for review in respect of an adverse nomination decision.”
In its judgement released on 16 December 2015, in the appealed case of Ahmad v DIBP*, the court considered the meaning of the words “sponsored by an approved sponsor” in s 338(2)(d)(i) of the Migration Regulations.
The court found that at the time Mr Ahmad was refused an sc457 visa, he was “sponsored by an approved sponsor” in that his approved sponsor had nominated him in its nomination application; although that nomination application had been refused, his sponsor had applied to review that decision and the decision was pending.
...