System Message:

Australian Immigration Daily News

Breaking Australian immigration news brought to you by Migration Alliance and associated bloggers. Please email help@migrationalliance.com.au

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form
Recent blog posts

Posted by on in General

The purpose of the instrument is to specify chemicals of security concern under subclauses 8551(2) and 8560(2) of Schedule 8 to the Migration Regulations, for the purposes of visa conditions 8551 and 8560.

These visa conditions require that visa holders who hold a Subclass 050 Bridging (General) visa or a Subclass 070 Bridging (Removal Pending) visa must obtain the Minister's approval before:

  • taking up employment in an occupation that involves the use of, or access to, chemicals of security concern; or 
  • acquiring chemicals of security concern

Source: LIN23053.pdf and LIN23053-Explanatory-Statement.pdf

Last modified on
Hits: 1011 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
0

Posted by on in General

A former migration agent’s legal aspirations have been dashed by a Supreme Court that found his history of providing inadequate advice to clients and lying to authorities was too recent.

Based on negative reports from a Board of Examiners and the Law Society of South Australia, the Supreme Court of South Australia found Ryan Raygan was not a fit and proper person to practise law and dismissed his application to join the legal profession.

Prior to graduating with a bachelor of law and graduate diploma in August 2022, Mr Raygan had been booted from the migration career for a number of contraventions, including failing to keep adequate client notes, failing to provide frank and candid advice to clients and copy-pasting from existing clients’ statement of claims to new ones.

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 1807 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
1

Posted by on in General

The instrument, Departmental reference LIN 23/062, is made under subregulation 2.07(5) of the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Migration Regulations) and subparagraph 1224A(3)(b)(iii) of Schedule 1 to the Regulations.

The purpose of this instrument is to retrospectively add Papua New Guinea passport holders to the class of persons who are excluded from the requirement in subparagraph 1224A(3)(b)(iii) of Schedule 1 to the Migration Regulations. This enables applicants from Papua New Guinea to make valid applications for a Subclass 462 visa without providing evidence of support for the grant of the visa from the Papua New Guinea government.

This instrument amends LIN 21/019 to implement Subclass 462 visa arrangements agreed to by the Australian Government and the Government of Papua New Guinea. This will assist to simplify the application process and remove the administrative burden for both countries.

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 1854 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
3

Posted by on in General

Purpose

3Subsection 26(1) of the Act requires a person to make a pledge of commitment to become an Australian citizen, unless they are a person to whom paragraphs 26(1)(a), (b) or (c) of the Act apply. Section 27 of the Act sets out how the pledge of commitment is to be made, and subsection 27(3) provides that the pledge of commitment must be made before a person mentioned in that provision.

Paragraph 27(3)(c) provides that a pledge of commitment may be made before a person who is included in a class of persons authorised under subsection 27(5) of the Act.

Subsection 27(5) of the Act provides that the Minister may, by legislative instrument, authorise a class of persons for the purposes of paragraph 27(3)(c).

...
Continue reading Last modified on
Hits: 1304 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
0

Posted by on in General

Some dodgy RTOs have been providing Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) instead of instructing these workers to follow the necessary TRA program. Usually coming from overseas, the workers are paying upwards of $20-30K for a fake qualification that doesn’t meet the requirements to get an electrical licence, so they are left with nothing.

There have also been reports of Australian workers who had partly completed an apprenticeship being sucked into paying for fake qualifications by these RTOs. Paying for electrician qualifications at a dodgy RTO is NOT a pathway to an electrical licence.

Source: Dodgy-RTOs-ripping-off-migrant-and-other-workers-through-fake-qualifications.pdf

Last modified on
Hits: 1442 0 Comments
Rate this blog entry:
0
Joomla SEF URLs by Artio