MIGRATION ALLIANCE SUPPORTS "SOLID INCUMBENT" STANLEY SHNEIDER FOR QLD/NT PRESIDENT OF THE MIA

The following is the statement provided to Migration Alliance for release, by nominee Stanley Schneider:

Labor has backed down on what many in the industry described as an unreasonable demand to increase the sc457 income threshold from $53,900 to $57,000 and has thus allowed the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) to pass parliament.

As part of the compromise with the opposition, the Coalition government has however agreed to a review of the Temporary Skilled Migration Income Threshold (TSMIT) later this year to see if any changes are still necessary. The last review recommended that the TSMIT should be frozen.

Analysts described the changes proposed by Labor in the compromise as ‘purely cosmetic’ and the delay in ratifying the agreement which has largely remained unchanged as unnecessary.

“The government has been vindicated for standing firm against the misleading and xenophobic campaign run against ChAFTA by the rogue Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union,” noted an opinion piece in The Australian today.

“The CFMEU conjured up an image of Chinese hordes descending on Australia to steal the jobs of locals. Bill Shorten did the right thing by striking a compromise with the Coalition and, however belatedly, repudiating the scare tactics of the CFMEU.”

...

Melbourne Cup Party

Migration Alliance and Expat Advisors Community

The following documents are circulating internationally and are confirmed as a scam. 

Scammer-using-OMARA-logo.pdf

Scammer---Demand-Letter.pdf

There has been another decision from the Federal Circuit Court which will help to untangle the tangled web surrounding the question of when the Administrative Appeals Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear an appeal against the refusal of a 457 visa application.

Readers of this blog will recall my articles on the decisions of the Federal Circuit Court in the earlier cases of Minister for Immigration v Lee & Ors (2014) FCCA 2881 (10 December 2014) and Kandel v Minister for Immigration & Anor (2015) FCCA 2013.

In the Lee case, Judge Nicholls held that the “MRT” (as it was then known) did not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal against the refusal of a 457 visa because the applicant did not have an approved sponsorship at the time that the appeal was lodged, due to the fact that the sponsorship had “lapsed” (due to the operation of Regulation 2.75, which provides that an approval of a nomination for a 457 visa ceases 12 months after the day on which the nomination is approved.